Gene M. Bland, Complainant,v.Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 5, 2006
01a60631 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 5, 2006)

01a60631

04-05-2006

Gene M. Bland, Complainant, v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.


Gene M. Bland v. Department of Transportation

01A60631

April 5, 2006

.

Gene M. Bland,

Complainant,

v.

Norman Y. Mineta,

Secretary,

Department of Transportation,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A60631

Agency No. 2005-19034-FAA-05

DECISION

Complainant appeals to the Commission from the agency's September 22,

2005 decision finding no discrimination. According to the agency's

decision, complainant alleges discrimination on the bases of race (Native

American), national origin (Native American), age (date of birth: April

23, 1945), and in reprisal for prior EEO activity when on November 14,

2004, complainant was informed that his temporary promotion to a GS-14

was not extended beyond the previously established six-month period and

he was reassigned to his former GS-13 position.

We find that the agency articulated a legitimate, nondiscriminatory

reason for its actions. The Unit Supervisor stated that he explained

to complainant that his promotion to the GS-14 position was for a

Not To Exceed (NTE) period. The Unit Supervisor asserted that he also

informed complainant that after the NTE period lapsed, and if the position

itself was made permanent, complainant would have to competitively bid.

The Unit Supervisor indicated that complainant was further informed

that no employee could be assigned to a noncompetitively bid position

for more than six months in any twelve-month period.

The Unit Supervisor articulated that he was not aware of any other

employee who had been in a temporary position and then permanently placed

without competitively applying for the position. The Unit Supervisor

argued that the sole reason complainant was not allowed to remain in the

position beyond the NTE period was because it would have been contrary

to the agency promotion requirements. In describing the process of

making a temporary position permanent, the Unit Supervisor said that

approval from the Headquarters Office was necessary to justify any

increase in local staffing. Regarding the temporary position to which

complainant was promoted, the Unit Supervisor reported that the Dallas

Flight Standards District Office (DAL-FSDO) did not have the requisite

approval to increase staffing levels.

Complainant failed to rebut the agency's articulated legitimate,

nondiscriminatory reasons for its actions. Furthermore, complainant

failed to show that the agency's action was motivated by discrimination.

Moreover, complainant failed to show, by a preponderance of the evidence,

that he was discriminated on the bases of race, national origin, age

or reprisal.

The agency's decision finding no discrimination is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 5, 2006

__________________

Date