Gearldine B.,1 Complainant,v.Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southern Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 30, 2016
0120150870 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 30, 2016)

0120150870

03-30-2016

Gearldine B.,1 Complainant, v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southern Area), Agency.


U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

Gearldine B.,1

Complainant,

v.

Megan J. Brennan,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Southern Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120150870

Agency No. 1G-756-0024-14

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated November 26, 2014, dismissing her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Mail Handler at the Agency's Network Distribution Center facility in Dallas, Texas.

Believing she was subjected to discrimination, on June 12, 2014, Complainant contacted the EEO Counselor. When the matter could not be resolved informally, on July 23, 2014, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the basis of sex (female) when, on or about May 7, 2014, she learned that she would not be recognized for her work and was not given a monetary award for her performance. Complainant indicated that she worked in the nationally top-ranked high speed tray sorter area. She indicated that the Supervisor presented cash awards to six male coworkers. She asserted that the last cash award was presented on May 7, 2014.

The Agency initially accepted the complaint for investigation. During the investigation, the Supervisor averred that the cash awards were requested in March 2014. The Supervisor indicated that the last cash award was issued on April 16, 2014.

Based on this information, the Agency dismissed complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) for untimely EEO Counselor contact. The Agency noted that the last cash award was issued to the recipient on April 16, 2014. Complainant first contacted the EEO Counselor on June 12, 2014, which the Agency found was beyond the 45-day time limit. As such, the Agency found that the matter should be dismissed.

Complainant appealed. On appeal, Complainant asserted that the Supervisor first announced the cash awards on April 16, 2014, but stated that, "There are more awards coming." As such, Complainant assumed that she and other female employees would be receiving their awards later. She stated that the last cash award was issued to a coworker on May 7, 2014, and non-cash awards were announced in the work area on June 5, 2014. Therefore, Complainant claimed that she could not have been aware that she was not receiving an award until all the awards were announced. Therefore, Complainant concluded that she was timely in raising her claim of discrimination with the EEO Counselor on June 12, 2014.

In response, the Agency asserted that the recipients of the cash awards had their checks cleared by April 7, 2014, and a certificate of appreciation was issued to them on April 16, 2014. Therefore, the Agency argued that the alleged discriminatory event occurred on April 16, 2014, and that Complainant's contact was beyond the 45 day time limit.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.105(a)(1) provides that an aggrieved person must initiate contact with an EEO Counselor within 45 days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel action, within 45 days of the effective date of the action. EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.105(a)(2) allows the Agency or the Commission to extend the time limit if the complainant can establish that he or she was not aware of the time limit, did not know and reasonably should not have known that the discriminatory matter or personnel action occurred, that despite due diligence he or she was prevented by circumstances beyond his/her control from contacting an EEO counselor within the time limit, or for other reasons considered sufficient by the Agency or Commission.

The Agency asserted that the decisions regarding the awards at issue were made in March 2014 and that the cash awards were given on April 7, 2014. However, Complainant indicated that she was not made aware of the cash awards until the Supervisor announced the awards to the workroom beginning on April 16, 2014. The Supervisor indicated that there were additional awards to be issued. Complainant only learned that she would not be receiving a cash award when the last cash award was announced on May 7, 2014.

The record is devoid of evidence contradicting Complainant's assertion that she became aware of the male coworker's cash award on May 7, 2014. Whereas here, there is an issue of timeliness, "[a]n agency always bears the burden of obtaining sufficient information to support a reasoned determination as to timeliness." See Guy v. Dep't of Energy, EEQC Request No. 05930703 (Jan. 4, 1994) (quoting Williams v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Request No 05920506 (Aug. 25, 1992). In addition, in Ericson v. Dep't of the Army, EEQC Request No. 05920623 (Jan. 14, 1993), the Commission slated that "the agency has the burden of providing evidence and/or proof to support its final decision. See also Gens v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05910837 (Jan. 31, 1992). In the instant matter, the Agency has not met its burden. Based on the foregoing, we find that Complainant reasonably suspected discrimination on May 7, 2014, and timely initiated EEO Counselor contact on June 12, 2014.

CONCLUSION

Based on a thorough review of the record and the contentions on appeal, including those not specifically addressed herein, we REVERSE the Agency's final decision and REMAND the matter for further processing in accordance with the ORDER below.

ORDER (E0610)

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108 et seq. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.

A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File a Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0815)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 � VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)

This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)

If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant's Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 30, 2016

__________________

Date

1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant's name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission's website.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120150870

5

0120150870