Gatke Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJun 11, 194241 N.L.R.B. 915 (N.L.R.B. 1942) Copy Citation In- the Matter of GATKE CORPORATION and INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AuroMOBILE WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFFILIATED WITH THE A.F.OFL. Case No. R-3486 SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION AND ` CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES June 11, 19/o On February 25, 1942, the National Labor Relations Board issued its Decision and Direction of Election in the above-entitled-proceed- ing.l Pursuant to the Direction of Election, an election by secret ballot was conducted on March 19, 1942, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Eleventh Region (In- dianapolis, Indiana). On April 17, 1942, the Regional Director, act- ing pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, issued an 'Election Report, copies of which were duly served upon the parties. As to the balloting and the results thereof, the Regional Director reported as follows : Total on eligibility list-------------------------------------- •132 Total ballots cast------------------------------------------- 135 Total ballots challenged------------------------------------- 19 Total blank ballots----------------------------------------- 2 Total void ballots------------------------------------------- 0 Total valid votes counted------------------------------------ 114 Votes cast for International Union United Automobile Workers of America (A. F. L.) ------------------------------------- 61 Votes cast against International Union United Automobile Workers of America (A. F. L.) ---------------------------- 53 . On April 24, 1942, Gatke Corporation, herein called the Company, filed Objections to the conduct of the ballot and to the Election Report, and requested a hearing on its Objections. On May 23, 1942, the Regional Director issued an Amended Election Report, copies of which were duly served on the parties. By letter dated May 27, 1942, counsel for the Company renewed the request for a hearing. The request is hereby denied. '39N L R B 197. 41 N. L. R. B., No. 163. 915 916 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD In the election Report and the Amended Election Report, the Re- gional Director recommended that the challenges be overruled as to 5 persons : Lacy Carpenter, Wayne Zolman, Ted Blue, Fred Osbun, and William Braddock, but recommended that the remaining 14 challenges be sustained. Of the five challenges overruled by the Regional Director, the Com- pany disputed the ruling as to Lacy Carpenter. The Regional Di- rector found that, although his name did not appear on the eligibility list, Lacy Carpenter had been temporarily laid off, was in that status on February 15, 1942,, the date directed by the Board to be used to determine voting eligibility in the election, and was, accordingly, eligible to vote, The Company argued that the Regional Director was inconsistent in overruling the challenge as to Lacy Carpenter and in sustaining the challenge as to one Elmer Quier, contending that the lay-off and subsequent . rehiring of both individuals occurred under identical circumstances. We find that Lacy Carpenter and Elmer Quier ,had both been temporarily laid off and were in that status on the date which governed voting eligibility, and that their ballots should have been counted. Of the remaining challenges sustained by the Regional Director, the Company disputed the rulings as to the following seven persons : Irl Braillier, .Roger Stafford, Arthur Braillier, Forest Deeter, Carl (Harold) Boggs, Earl West, and Gloyd Whitesell. Each one of these seven was challenged by the International Union, United ,Automobile Workers, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, herein called the Union, on the ground that he was a supervisor : Irl Braillier, Arthur Braillier, and Earl West In an election in a prior -case 2 involving the same plant of the Company, in which no collective bargaining agent was selected by, a majority of the Company's employees in the appropriate unit, the Regional Director sustained challenges of the petitioning union therein as to Irl Braillier, Arthur Braillier, and Earl West. The Board sustained that ruling. The Regional Director found that the evidence submitted with respect to these three employees in the present proceeding is almost identical to that upon which he based his former ruling. We are of the same opinion and, accordingly, sustain his ruling as to Irl Braillier, Arthur Braillier, and Earl West. 2 Matter of Gatke Corporation and Federal Labor Union #2241 of the American Fed- eration,of Labor, 30 N L R. B. 514; 33 N. L R. B. 216. G.ATKE' CORPORATION 917 Roger Stafford The, Regional Director's investigation discloses that Stafford is employed as a machine set-up man, that he checks- and gauges ma- chinery and looks after the operation thereof by seven employees of the Company, and that in the absence of other orders from a gen, oral foreman, he directs the duties of these seven operators. Stafford stated in his affidavit, filed by the Company with the Regional Di- rector, that in the absence of a foreman, he and the other employees continue with their work and discuss any problems that may arise with other men in their department or with the "office." We believe that while he is responsible for the maintenance of machines as 'set up, his duties are not supervisory in character and his work is com- parable to that of ordinary production workers.3 We find, contrary to the Regional Director, that Roger Stafford is within the appro= priate unit and that his ballot should have been counted. Forrest Deeter The Regional Director's investigation discloses that Deeter is em- ployed in the Supply Department as a storeroom keeper and re- ceiving clerk, that he prepares requisitions for needed materials to the Chicago office of the Company, that he issues supplies from the storeroom as required at the plant,-and that he directs the work of two employees in- the storeroom and is considered the person in -charge. We agree with the Regional Director's conclusion that Deeter is a- supervisor and sustain the ruling in which he upheld the challenge to Deeter's ballot. _ Carl (Harold) Boggs The Regional Director's investigation discloses that Boggs is em- ployed as a mixer and loader in the Mixing Department, that he directs the work of 8 or 10 employees and is considered by them as their supervisor, that he has authority to grant time off to these employees, and that he asserted at the time of the election that he recommended the hiring and discharging of employees. We agree with the Regional Director's conclusion that Boggs is a supervisor and with his ruling sustaining the challenge to the ballot of Boggs. Gloyd Whitesell The Regional Director's investigation discloses that Whitesell is employed as a first pressman in the Block•Department, that he lays 3 Matter of B. F. Sturtevant Company and United Electrical and Radio Workers Local Union No . 248, 8 N . L. R. B 835. Matter of The Liquid Carbonic Corporation and Independ- ent Beverage Machinery Builder's Union, 35 N L R. B 674. 918 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD out work for other employees and directs, them in their method of work, that he grants time off to employees, that he is responsible for the training of new employees, and that he stated at the time of the election that he was a foreman over eight pressmen. , We agree with the Regional Director's conclusion that Whitesell is a supervisor and we, therefore, affirm the Regional Director's ruling sustaining the challenge to Whitesell's ballot. No objections were made by any of the parties to the Regional Director's rulings on the remaining six challenges. We concur in these rulings. We find that as to Lacy Carpenter, Wayne Zolman, Ted Blue; Fred Osbun, and William Braddock, the Regional Director properly overruled the challenges to their ballots. As found above, Elmer Quier and Roger Stafford were also eligible to vote. However, the 7 votes herein ruled valid cannot affect the results of-the election since the Union has received 61 out of a total of 121 valid ballots cast. We shall, therefore, certify the Union as the bargaining representative of the employees in the appropriate unit. CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES ' By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act, 49 Stat. 449, and pursuant to Article III, Sections 8 and 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that International Union United Automobile Workers of America, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, has been designated and selected by a majority of all production and maintenance employees of Gatke Corporation, Warsaw, Indiana, excluding supervisory and clerical employees, as their representative for the purposes of collective bargaining, and that, pursuant to Sec- tion 9 (a) of the Act, International Union United Automobile Work- ers of America, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, is the exclusive representative of all such employees for the purposes of collective bargaining in respect to rates of pay, wages, hours of em- ployment, and other conditions of employment. CHAIRMAN MILLIS took no part in the consideration of the above SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION AND CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation