Gary B. Adams, Complainant,v.Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency) Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 13, 2005
01a52366 (E.E.O.C. May. 13, 2005)

01a52366

05-13-2005

Gary B. Adams, Complainant, v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency) Agency.


Gary B. Adams v. Defense Contract Management Agency

01A52366

05-13-05

.

Gary B. Adams,

Complainant,

v.

Donald H. Rumsfeld,

Secretary,

Department of Defense

(Defense Contract Management Agency)

Agency.

Appeal Nos. 01A52366,01A52367

Agency Nos. YS-04-1060A,YS-04-1060B

DISMISSAL OF APPEALS

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant untimely appealed

the agency's final decision (FAD) in EEOC Appeal No. 01A52366, Agency

No. YS-04-1060A, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.403(c). The Commission

affirms the agency's decision in 01A52367, Agency No. YS-04-1060B, since

complainant failed to state a claim for which relief may be granted,

pursuant to � 1614.107(a)(1).

01A52366

By Notice of Appeal postmarked December 9, 2004, complainant filed an

appeal of Agency No. YS-04-1060A with this Commission from the October

12, 2004 FAD dismissing his EEO complaint of unlawful employment

discrimination. A review of the FAD reveals that the agency properly

advised complainant that he had thirty (30) calendar days after receipt

of its final decision to file his appeal with the Commission. Therefore,

in order to be considered timely, complainant had to file his appeal

no later than November 11, 2004. Complainant has not offered adequate

justification for an extension of the applicable time limit for filing

his appeal. Accordingly, complainant's December 9, 2004 appeal is

hereby dismissed. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.403(c).

01A52367

This case is an appeal of the agency's final decision in Agency

No. YS-04-1060B. Complainant alleges that he was retaliated against

in violation of the Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973

(Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq., when on October

19, 2004, he became aware that the agency failed to take disciplinary

actions against the Commander of the Defense Contract Management Agency

in Virginia, who provided false statements in an affidavit concerning

complainant's previous case, Agency No. XL-02-003. The agency issued

a FAD dismissing the complaint because the allegation was dealt with

in a previous case, Agency No. YS-03-0906, which ultimately settled.

The agency also dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).

The Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim under the

EEOC regulations because complainant failed to show that he suffered harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force,

EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Accordingly, the agency's

final decision dismissing complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

____05-13-05______________

Date