Gabriele G.,1 Complainant,v.Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Capital Metro Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Feb 17, 2016

0520160046 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 17, 2016)

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013

Gabriele G.,1
Complainant,

v.

Megan J. Brennan,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service
(Capital Metro Area),
Agency.

Request No. 0520160046
Appeal No. 0120151499
Agency No. 4K-300-0177-12

DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Complainant requested reconsideration of the decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120151499
(September 16, 2015). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion,
grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party
demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of
material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c).

In her underlying complaint, Complainant alleged that the Agency subjected her to unlawful
discrimination on the bases of her race and disability when2: (1) on May 31, 2012,
management issued her a letter of warning for failure to work in a safe manner; (2) on June
18, 2012, management issued her a letter of warning for failure to follow instructions and
failure to be regular in attendance; (3) since June 29, 2012, management reduced her work
hours; (4) since June 29, 2012, management denied her a reasonable accommodation; and (5)
beginning October 1, 2012, management denied her 204B training and a 204B detail
assignment. The Agency’s final decision found that Complainant failed to show that she was
subjected to discrimination as alleged. On appeal, the Commission affirmed the Agency’s final
decision concluding that Complainant failed to show that she was denied a reasonable

1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name
when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website.
2 The record shows that Complainant withdrew the basis of age.
0520160046

2
accommodation or that the Agency’s articulated reasons for its actions were a pretext for
unlawful discrimination.

In her request for reconsideration, Complainant reiterates her contention that the Agency
denied her a reasonable accommodation. These arguments were, however, fully considered on
appeal. Accordingly, after reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the
Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c), and it
is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No.
0120151499 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative
appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal
from the Commission’s decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate
United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive
this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the
person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or
her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in
court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office,
facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)

If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may
request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or
costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may
request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of
court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court
has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the
time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File
a Civil Action for the specific time limits).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations

February 17, 2016
Date