Franklin Smithson, Complainant,v.Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 20, 2003
05A30466 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 20, 2003)

05A30466

03-20-2003

Franklin Smithson, Complainant, v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.


Franklin Smithson v. Social Security Administration

05A30466

March 20, 2003

.

Franklin Smithson,

Complainant,

v.

Jo Anne B. Barnhart,

Commissioner,

Social Security Administration,

Agency.

Request No. 05A30466

Appeal No. 01A14263

Agency No. 930-372

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Franklin Smithson (complainant) timely initiated a request to the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the

decision in Franklin Smithson v. Social Security Administration, EEOC

Appeal No. 01A14263 (February 12, 2003). EEOC Regulations provide that

the Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission

decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate

decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact

or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact

on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.405(b).

In our previous decision, we affirmed the agency's award to complainant

of $1,000.00 in nonpecuniary compensatory damages he suffered as a result

of unlawful discrimination by the agency. In his request to reconsider,

complainant renews his previously-raised arguments in opposition to the

amount of the agency's nonpecuniary damages award, but fails to indicate

how the previous decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of

material fact or law or will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. Accordingly, after a review of

complainant's request for reconsideration, the previous decision, and

the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet

the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the

Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01A14263

remains the Commission's final decision. There is no further right of

administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request

for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

�Agency� or �department� means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

(�Right to File A Civil Action�).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 20, 2003

Date