01a02808
02-22-2001
Frank Santillan, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Frank Santillan v. United States Postal Service
01A02808
February 22, 2001
.
Frank Santillan,
Complainant,
v.
William J. Henderson,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A02808
Agency No. 4G-770-0156-99
Hearing No. 330-99-8350X
DECISION
Complainant timely initiated an appeal from the agency's final action
concerning his equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaint of unlawful
employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.<1> The
appeal is accepted pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405. Complainant alleges
he was discriminated against on the bases of race (white), sex (male)
and national origin (Hispanic) when, during the first week of December
1998, his request to change his non-scheduled day from Monday, December
28, 1998, to Saturday, December 26, 1998 was denied. For the following
reasons, the Commission affirms the agency's final action.
The record reveals that complainant, a Clerk at the agency's River Oaks
Station, Houston, Texas, filed a formal EEO complaint with the agency
alleging that the Station Manager (Manager) discriminated against him as
referenced above. At the conclusion of the investigation, complainant
received a copy of the investigative report and requested a hearing before
an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ). Finding no material facts in dispute,
the AJ issued a decision without a hearing, finding no discrimination.
The AJ concluded that, assuming complainant established a prima facie case
of discrimination, the agency articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory
reasons for its actions, which complainant failed to establish were a
pretext to mask unlawful discrimination/retaliation. In reaching this
conclusion, the AJ noted the Manager's statement in which she averred that
she denied the request because of business conditions. The Manager stated
that on December 26, 1998, she had one person out on continuation of pay,
one person on annual leave, twelve people on their non-scheduled days,
and consequently had to schedule two people for overtime all day.
The agency's final action implemented the AJ's decision. Complainant
makes no new contentions on appeal, and the agency requests that we
affirm its final action.
After a careful review of the record, the Commission finds that the
AJ's decision properly summarized the relevant facts and referenced the
appropriate regulations, policies, and laws. We note that complainant
failed to present evidence that any of the agency's actions were motivated
by discriminatory animus toward complainant's race, sex, or national
origin. We discern no basis to disturb the AJ's decision. Therefore,
after a careful review of the record, including complainant's contentions
on appeal, the agency's response, and arguments and evidence not
specifically addressed in this decision, we AFFIRM the agency's final
action.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0900)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
February 22, 2001
__________________
Date
1 On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal
sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply
to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the
administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the
revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the present
appeal. The regulations, as amended, may be found at the Commission's
website at www.eeoc.gov.