Frank J. Ferlita, Complainant,v.Andrew M. Cuomo, Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 6, 2000
01997253 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 6, 2000)

01997253

12-06-2000

Frank J. Ferlita, Complainant, v. Andrew M. Cuomo, Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Agency.


Frank J. Ferlita v. Department of Housing and Urban Development

01997253

December 6, 2000

.

Frank J. Ferlita,

Complainant,

v.

Andrew M. Cuomo,

Secretary,

Department of Housing and Urban Development,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01997253

Agency No. AT 98 05

DECISION

Upon review, we find that the complaint was properly dismissed

on the grounds of failure to state a claim pursuant to 29

C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1). Complainant claimed that he was discriminated

against when a younger male employee was placed into an attorney position

at a GS-14 level as a result of a settlement of that individual's EEO

complaint. Complainant believed that he should have had an opportunity to

compete for the GS-14 position. Complainant also claimed that the Office

of Departmental Equal Employment Opportunity denied his request for the

services of an Hispanic Equal Opportunity Counselor in January 1998.

Complainant is challenging the agency's decision to award a position

to an individual in order to effectuate a settlement agreement of an

EEO complaint. The Commission has previously held that a claim of

discrimination based on another party's settlement agreement fails to

state a claim where there has been no showing that the agreement was

executed in bad faith because processing such claims would discourage

voluntary conciliation of the complaint. See Faison v. Department of

the Army, EEOC Request No. 05900956 (October 12, 1990). Complainant has

failed to establish that the other party's settlement was executed in

bad faith, i.e., that it is a discriminatory attempt to bestow unequal

benefits under the guise of remedying discrimination.

With regard to complainant's claim that he was improperly denied an

Hispanic Equal Opportunity Counselor, we find that the agency properly

dismissed this claim for failure to state a processable matter.

It is undisputed that complainant was provided with an EEO Counselor,

while not his Counselor of choice, the agency was in compliance with

the regulations regarding assignment of a Counselor. Accordingly, the

agency decision dismissing the complaint on the grounds of failure to

state a claim was proper and is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 6, 2000

__________________

Date