01a03210
07-12-2000
Francisco D. Esteban, Complainant, v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.
Francisco D. Esteban v. Richard J. Danzig
01A03210
July 12, 2000
Francisco D. Esteban, )
Complainant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01A03210
) Agency No. 006175501002
Richard J. Danzig, )
Secretary, )
Department of the Navy, )
Agency. )
____________________________________)
DECISION
Complainant timely initiated an appeal from the agency's dismissal of
his equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaint of unlawful employment
discrimination on the bases of race (Pacific Islander Filipino)
and age (DOB: 09/17/27), in violation of Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq, and the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621
et seq.<1> Complainant alleged that he was discriminated against when:
(1) on September 30, 1997, he was separated by a Reduction-in-Force
(RIF) action; and (2) since September 30, 1997, he was not referred
or selected for a position from the Priority Placement Program (PPP).
The appeal is accepted pursuant to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999)(to
be codified at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405).
The record reveals that complainant was employed as a GS-4 Security
Guard at the agency's U.S. Fleet and Industrial Supply Center, Guam.
Complainant was separated effective September 30, 1997, due to the Base
Realignment and Closure of 1995. Complainant contacted the EEO Office
on August 20, 1999, by letter, jointly filing an informal complaint
with a co-worker who was also separated in the RIF. Thereafter, the
agency issued a dismissal of issue (1) for untimely contact with an
EEO counselor. Complainant appealed.
Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant presents no persuasive
arguments or evidence regarding why he failed to contact an EEO counselor
within the regulatory time period. Accordingly, complainant's issue (1)
was properly dismissed pursuant to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to
be codified and hereinafter referred to as EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �
1614.107(a)(2)) for untimely contact with an EEO counselor.
The Commission further finds that the agency failed to address issue (2).
On remand, the agency shall continue the processing of that claim.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, the agency's dismissal of issue (1) is AFFIRMED and issue
(2) is REMANDED for further processing.
ORDER (E0400)
The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded claim in accordance with
64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656-7 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108). The agency shall acknowledge to
the complainant that it has received the remanded claim within thirty (30)
calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall
issue to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall
notify complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty
(150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the
matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant
requests a final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue
a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's
request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a
copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of
rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1199)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The
report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the
complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order,
the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order.
29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a
civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior
to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408), and 29 C.F.R. �
1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a
civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph
below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407
and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the
underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �
2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the complainant files a civil action, the
administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for
enforcement, will be terminated. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999)
(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409).
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0300)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED
WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF
RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred
to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management
Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).
All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must
also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0400)
This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative
processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil
action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United
States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date
that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a
civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date
you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the
Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN
THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT
HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
July 12, 2000
________________________________
Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations
FOR OFO INTERNAL CIRCULATION ONLY
FOR PROCEDURAL CASES
TO: CARLTON M. HADDEN, ACTING DIR.
OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS
APPEAL NUMBER: 01A03210
AGENCY NUMBER: 006175501002
(APPROVED) (DATE)
REQUEST NUMBER:
HEARING NUMBER:
THE ATTACHED DECISION IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
TITLE
NAMES
INITIAL
DATE REVIEWED
(ATTORNEY): Doreen Kaufmann
7-11-00
(SUPERVISOR: Mary Jean Moore
(DIVISION DIRECTOR): Marie Fitzgerald
1.) (COMPLAINANT(S) Francisco D. Esteban
2.) (AGENCY) Department of the Navy
3.) (DECISION) Affirmed in part, Remanded
4.) (STATUTE(S Title VII, ADEA
5.) (BASIS(ES) RA, OA
6.) (ISSUE(S) L1, H2
7.) (TYPIST/DATE/DISK) DK01/ 7-11-00
SPELL CHECK: YES
(PLEASE CHECK ALL APPLICABLE CODES)
PROCEDURAL CODES
LETTER CLOSURE CODES
X 3K - PROCEDURAL DECISION
? 3N - APPEAL DENIED/DISMISSED
? 3P - ADVERSE INFERENCE RAISED
4H - OFO AFFIRMED FAD
? 3M - OFO REVERSED AND REMANDED
? 4J - OFO MODIFIED FAD
? 3L - OFO VACATED/REMANDED ALL OF
AGENCY'S MERITS DECISION
? 4Q - COMPLIANCE REQUIRED
? 3B - FAD RESCINDED
? 3C - DUPLICATE DOCKET NUMBER
? 3D - WITHDRAWAL
? 3E - COMPLAINT SETTLED
? 3G - OTHER LETTER CLOSURE
? 3R - RETURN TO AG FOR CONSOLIDATION
? 3S - RETURN TO AJ FOR CONSOLIDATION
? 7N - CIVIL ACTION FILED
[REVISED AS OF 2/3/00]
1 On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal
sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all
federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative
process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations
found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the
present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the
Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.