Ford Motor Companyv.SIGNAL IP, INC.Download PDFPatent Trials and Appeals BoardFeb 18, 201610214048 - (D) (P.T.A.B. Feb. 18, 2016) Copy Citation Trials@uspto.gov Paper 19 571-272-7822 Date: February 18, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ____________ FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SIGNAL IP, INC., Patent Owner. ____________ Case IPR2015-00860 Patent 6,775,601 B2 ____________ Before JOSIAH C. COCKS, MITCHELL G. WEATHERLY, and CHARLES J. BOUDREAU, Administrative Patent Judges. COCKS, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT AND FINAL WRITTEN DECISION 37 C.F.R. § 42.73 and 35 U.S.C. § 318(a) IPR2015-00860 Patent 6,775,601 B2 2 I. BACKGROUND Petitioner, Ford Motor Company, filed a Petition for inter partes review of claims 1–17 of U.S. Patent 6,775,601 B2 (the “’601 patent”) on March 13, 2015. Paper 1. Patent Owner, Signal IP, Inc. (“Signal IP”), filed a Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response on June 18, 2015. Paper 5. We instituted trial as to claims 1–17 of the ’601 patent on September 4, 2015. Paper 7. Signal IP subsequently filed a Patent Owner’s Response on November 25, 2015. Paper 16 (“Response” or “PO Resp.”). In the Response, Signal IP represents that in a concurrent Reexamination of the ’601 patent (Control No. 90/013,385) it filed an amendment seeking to cancel claims 8–11, 13, 15, and 17. PO Resp. 1. Signal IP also represents that on the same day it filed a statutory disclaimer as to claims 1–7, 12, 14, and 16. Id.1 On December 28, 2015, Signal IP filed a copy of an Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate that issued in connection with the ’601 patent on December 23, 2015. Ex. 2007. That Certificate indicates that claims 8–11, 13, 15, and 17 are cancelled. Id. at 1:15. Therefore, every claim subject to this inter partes review has been either disclaimed or canceled, and no claims remain in this trial. II. ANALYSIS As set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.73: (b) Request for adverse judgment. A party may request judgment against itself at any time during a proceeding. Actions construed to be a request for adverse judgment include: . . . (2) Cancellation or disclaimer of a claim such that the party has no remaining claim in the trial. 1 The statutory disclaimer is entered in this proceeding as Exhibit 2005. IPR2015-00860 Patent 6,775,601 B2 3 Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b), we construe the disclaimer of claims 1–7, 12, 14, and 16 and cancellation of all remaining claims in this proceeding as a request for adverse judgment. We grant that request and enter judgment against Signal IP under 37 C.F.R. § 42.73. III. ORDER Accordingly, it is ORDERED that judgment is entered under 37 C.F.R. § 42.73 against Signal IP with respect to claims 1–17 of the ’601 patent; and FURTHER ORDERED that this Order constitutes a Final Written Decision under 35 U.S.C. § 318(a). IPR2015-00860 Patent 6,775,601 B2 4 For PETITIONER: Frank A. Angileri BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C. FPGP0117IPR1@brookskushman.com Lissi Mojica Kevin Greenleaf DENTONS US LLP iptdocketchi@dentons.com For PATENT OWNER: Tarek N. Fahmi ASCENDA LAW GROUP, PC tarek.fahimi@ascendalaw.com Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation