Florida Steel Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJun 17, 1976224 N.L.R.B. 1033 (N.L.R.B. 1976) Copy Citation FLORIDA STEEL CORPORATION Florida Steel Corporation and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO Cases 12-CA-6567, 12- CA-6572, and 12-CA-6581 June 17, 1976 ORDER DENYING MOTION By MEMBERS FANNING, PENELLO, AND WALTHER On May 22, 1976, the Board issued a Decision and Order, 223 NLRB 174, a panels finding, inter alia, that Respondent's no-solicitation clause as modified on December 4, 1974, was valid,2 and that the "na- ture of [Respondent's] unlawful conduct [was not] of such a character that it requires the extraordi- nary remedies utilized in the Stevens case " 3 i Members Fanning Penello and Walther 2 Member Fanning dissented on this issue 3 N L R B v J P Stevens & Co Inc 464 F 2d 1326 (C A 2 1972) and amended contempt adjudication 81 LRRM 2285 68 LC ¶12896 ( Septem her 13 1972) 1033 On April 14, 1976, the Union filed with respect to the foregoing findings a motion for reconsideration by the full Board Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the Na- tional Labor Relations Board has delegated its au- thority in this proceeding to a three-member panel which participated in the Decision 4 As the Union presents no matters not previously considered, we shall deny its motions 5 ORDER It is hereby ordered that the Union' s motion for reconsideration be, and it hereby is, denied 4 It is the policy of the Board for the same panel which decides a case to pass upon any motion for reconsideration of a panel decision and for the full Board to consider such a motion only if the panel refers it to the full Board Enterprise Industrial Piping Company 118 NLRB 1 (1957) 5 Member Fanning would grant the motion insofar as it pertains to Respondents no solicitation clause 224 NLRB No 137 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation