Felicia T. Battle, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 10, 2005
01a51332 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 10, 2005)

01a51332

03-10-2005

Felicia T. Battle, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Felicia T. Battle v. United States Postal Service

01A51332

March 10, 2005

.

Felicia T. Battle,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A51332

Agency No. 1K-214-0008-04

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated November 4, 2004, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. In her

complaint, complainant alleged that she was subjected to discrimination

on the basis of sex (female) when:

On August 28, 2004, she was physically assaulted by the Supervisor.

On unspecified dates, she was threatened with discipline.

The agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)

for failure to state a claim. With regards to claim 1, the agency

concluded that complainant failed to provide any evidence that would

suggest that she suffered a personal loss or harm with respect to a term,

condition, or privilege of employment as a result of the alleged physical

assault. The agency also concluded that even if complainant was able

to show that she was harmed by the alleged assault, because she filed

a Workers' Compensation claim, the alleged assault was not reviewable

by the Commission because the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

has exclusive jurisdiction over the matter. With regards to claim 2,

the agency concluded that complainant was not able to provide evidence

to show that she was disciplined. Moreover, complainant had not shown

that she suffered any adverse action as a result of being threatened

with discipline.

The Commission finds that the complaint is more appropriately defined

as a claim of harassment.

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in

relevant part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to

state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved

employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she

has been discriminated against by that agency because of race, color,

religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. ��

1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has

long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force,

EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).

A review of the record shows that complainant initiated the EEO counseling

process and filed the instant complaint alleging that she was �physically

assaulted� by her supervisor. The EEO Counselor's report contains the

Supervisor's account of what occurred regarding the alleged assault,

but was silent regarding complainant's account of the alleged assault.

Complainant's complaint does not provide any detail regarding the alleged

assault. Moreover, the record is devoid of any evidence from complainant

that details the alleged assault. Without additional evidence, such as

complainant's account as to what occurred we cannot make a determination

on whether the complaint states a claim. We find the record insufficient

to render a decision on the matter.

Furthermore, we find that the incident regarding the alleged threats of

discipline are connected to the alleged physical assault. Complainant

claims that she was threatened with discipline as a result of the August

28, 2004 assault. These two incidents should be considered together

by the agency as a claim of harassment. Because we seek clarification

on the nature of the alleged physical assault, we can not yet render a

determination on whether the claim of harassment is sufficiently severe or

pervasive so as to state a claim. On remand, the agency shall consider

both incidents together in making its determination as to whether the

complaint states a claim.

The agency's decision is VACATED and we REMAND the complaint to the

agency for further processing in accordance with this decision and

applicable regulations.

ORDER

The agency shall contact complainant in order to supplement the record

with complainant's account of the alleged August 28, 2004, physical

assault. Within 30 days of the date this decision becomes final, the

agency shall issue a decision dismissing the complaint or issue a letter

of acceptance of the complaint. A copy of the decision dismissing the

complaint or a copy of the letter of acceptance of the complaint must

be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced herein.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 10, 2005

__________________

Date