Federal Electric Products Co. Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsOct 30, 194564 N.L.R.B. 601 (N.L.R.B. 1945) Copy Citation In the Matter of FEDERAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTS Co. INC. and INTERNA- TIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, A. F. OF L. Case No. I-R4595.-Decided October 30, 19J,.5 Mr. Charles Kurz, of New York City, for the Company. Mr. Francis X. Moore, of Boston, Mass., for the AFL. Mr. William S. Zeman, of Hartford, Conn., for the CIO. Mr. Glenn L. Holler, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon a petition duly filed by International Brotherhood of Elec- trical Workers, A. F. of L., herein called the AFL, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of Federal Electric Products Co. Inc., Hartford, Con- necticut, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Robert E. Greene, Trial Examiner.' The hearing was held at Hart- ford, Connecticut, on September 19, 1945. At the commencement of the hearing the Trial Examiner granted a motion of United Elec- trical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, Amalgamated Local 281, C. I. 0., herein called the CIO, to intervene. The Company, the AFL, and the CIO appeared, participated, and were afforded full op- portunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues. The,Trial Examiner's rul- ings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded opportunity to file briefs with the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : 1 The Trial Examiner granted a motion of the Company to amend the pleadings in the case so that the name of the Company would read "Federal Electric Products Co , Inc." Instead of Federal Electrical Co or Federal Electric Products Company. 64 N. L. R. B, No. 100. 601 602 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Federal Electric Products Co. Inc. is a New Jersey corporation, with its principal office located in Newark, New Jersey. The only plant in- volved in the instant proceeding is located in Hartford, Connecticut. The Hartford plant is engaged in the manufacture of motor con- trols, circuit breakers, and service equipment. In the course of its operations during the fiscal year from July 1944, to' July 1945, the Company used raw materials, including copper, brass, and steel, val- ued at in excess of $800,000. Approximately 65 percent of these raw materials was shipped to the Hartford plant from points outside the State of Connecticut. During the same fiscal year the Company pro- duced at the Hartford plant finished products valued at in excess of $1,000,000, of which approximately 90 percent was shipped to points outside the State of Connecticut. The company admits and we find that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers is a labor organ- ization affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, admitting to membership employees of the Company. United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, Amalga- mated Local 281, is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION On September 1, 1944, the Company and the CIO signed an ex- clusive recognition contract which was to run for 1 year, renewable from year to year thereafter, unless, 30 days prior to any expiration date either party notified the other of a desire to terminate or modify the contract. The CIO contended at the hearing that the contract constitutes a bar to these proceedings. Evidence at the hearing disclosed that during the last week of July 1945, the AFL orally notified the Company of its claim t+@ represent a substantial number of the Company's employees and that under date' of August 1, 1945, the AFL by letter again informed the Company of the above claim. We find that the contract does not constitute a bar to a present determination of representatives, in view of the AFL's timely demand. FEDERAL ELECTRIC PRODUCTS CO. INC. 603 The Company took the position at the hearing that it could not bar- gain,with petitioner, or any other labor organization of its employees, until such time as it has been certified by the Board. A statement of the Regional Director introduced into evidence at the hearing indicates that the AFL represents a substantial number of employees in the unit hereinafter found to be appropriate 2 We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT We find, substantially in accordance with the stipulation of the parties, that all employees of the Company at its Hartford, Con- necticut, plant, except executives, office and clerical employees, rate settlers, foremen, and all other supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees or effectively recommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within,the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by means of an election by secret ballot among the employees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of the National Labor Rela- tions Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Federal Electric 2 The Regional Director reported that the AFL had submitted 60 authorization cards, 57 of which were dated between May and July 1945, and 3 of which were undated. AN appeared to bear genuine original signatures . Of the cards submitted 53 bore names of persons listed on the Company's pay roll for the pay-roll period ending August 11, 1945, which pay roll contained the names of 217 persons in the appropriate unit. The CIO did not present any evidence of membership but relied upon its contract as evidence of its interest in the proceedings while the showing of the AFL is only approximately 24 percent of the claimed appro- priate unit , we find that this showing is substantial in view of a clause in the contract requiring membership in good standing in the CIO. Matter of Oregon Plywood Company, et at, 33 N L . R. B 1234; Matter of Certasn -Teed Products Corporation , et at, 28 N. L. R. B. 915 604 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Products Co. Inc., Hartford, Connecticut, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and super- vision of the Regional Director for the First Region, acting in this mat- ter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceeding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding any who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, to determine whether they desire to be represented by International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, A. F. of L., or by United Electrical, Radio & Ma- chine Workers of America, Amalgamated Local 281, C. I. 0., for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither. MR. GERARD D. REILLY took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Election. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation