Faultless Caster Corp.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Dec 15, 1943

53 N.L.R.B. 1335 (N.L.R.B. 1943)

In the Matter Of FAULTLESS CASTER CORPORATION and UNITED
ELECTRICAL, RADIO & MACHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, CIO
Case No. 14-R-805.-Decided December 15, 1943
Mr. Isidor Kahn, of Evansville, Ind., for the Company.
Mr. James Payne, of Evansville, Ind., and Mr. David Scribner,
of New York City, for the CIO.
Mr. Glenn L. Moller, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon a petition duly filed by United Electrical, Radio & Machine
Workers of America, CIO, herein called the CIO, alleging that a
question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation
of employees of Faultless Caster Corporation, Evansville, Indiana,-
herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board pro-
vided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Harry G.
Carlson, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held at Evansville,
Indiana, on November 12, 1943. The Company and the CIO appeared,
participated, and were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to
examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bear-
ing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing
are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties
were afforded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board. The CIO
waived "any right, power, or privilege to protest any election held
(in this proceeding) on any ground set forth in Cases Nos. 14-C-784
and 14-C-899." 2
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
Faultless Caster Corporation is an Indiana corporation with its
principal office and place of business at Evansville, Indiana, where it
145 N L R B. 146; enforced 135 F (2d) 559
2 Charges filed since the hearing in the instant proceeding.
53 N. L. R. B., No. 243.
1335
1336 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
is engaged in the manufacture of casters and furniture hardware.
During the year 1942, the Company purchased raw materials valued
in excess of $50,000, approximately 75 percent of which was shipped
to the Company from points outside the State of Indiana. During
the same period the Company sold and shipped finished products
valued in excess of $100,000 approximately 75 percent of which was
shipped to points outside the State of Indiana. The Company is also
currently engaged in war production.
We find that the Company is engaged in commerce within the
meaning bf the National Labor Relations Act.
II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED
United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, affiliated
with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, is a labor organization
admitting to membership employees of the Company.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
By letter dated October 16, 1943, the CIO requested recognition as
the exclusive bargaining representative of the Company's employees.
The Company failed to respond to the CIO's request.
A statement of the Regional Director, introduced into evidence at
the hearing, indicates that the CIO represents a substantial number
of employees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate.3
We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning
of Section 9 (c) and Section 20(6) and (7) of the Act.
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
The CIO contends that the appropriate unit consists of all em-
ployees of the Company, including toolroom and tool crib employees,
non-militarized watchmen and firemen, but excluding the superin-
tendent, assistant superintendent, foremen, assistant foremen, uni-
formed guards, office and clerical employees, part-time after-school
workers, and all supervisory eil ployees who have authority to hire,
discharge, promote, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the
status of employees or effectively recommend such action. The Com-
pany agrees that the above unit is appropriate with the minor excep-
tions hereafter discussed.
There is a classification of employees, about 50 in number, referred
to as group leaders. The CIO,contends that group leaders are super-
The Regional Director repotted that the CIO submitted 182 authorization cards bearing
apparently genuine signatures At the hearing the CIO submitted 26 additional designa-
tions The Company failed to furnish a pay roll, but stated at the hearing that there
are approximately 380 employees in the appropriate unit,
FAULTLESS CASTER CORPORATION 1337
visory employees and should therefore be excluded from the unit.
The Company denies that group leaders have supervisory authority
and contends that they should be included in the unit . The evidence
reveals that group leaders have none of the indicia of supervisory.
employees . Their time is spent entirely on either production work
or instruction of inexperienced employees . They do not receive ad-
ditional compensation by reason of their classification as group
leaders and they participate in incentive pay with the employees in
their groups. They have no authority to hire or discharge nor to
recommend such action . Their relationship with the employees with
whom they work appears to be comparable to the relationship of a
journeyman and an apprentice ., They will be included in the unit.
The CIO contended that there are some employees classified as group
leaders who have greater supervisory authority than the other group
leaders. The record fails to substantiate this contention . If there
are such employees , they will be excluded by application of the
definition of supervisory employees set forth hereinbelow.
The only other category of employees in dispute is that of night
watchmen - firemen. The CIO seeks to include these employees while
the Company wishes to exclude them. These employees, like the uni-
formed guards , are members of the auxiliary military police. In con-
formance with our established practice in this regard , all militarized
personnel will be excluded from the unit.
We find that all employees of the Company, including toolroom and
tool crib attendants and group leaders , but excluding office and clerical
employees , technical employees, militarized guards and watchmen,
part-time after -school workers , foremen, assistant foremen, and all
other supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge,
discipline , or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or
effectively to recommend such action , constitute a unit appropriate for
the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section
9 (b) of the Act.
V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
We shall direct that the question concerning representation which
has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em-
ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-
roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Elec-
tion herein , subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the
Direction.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor
Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act,
1338 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR. RELATIONS BOARD
and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations
Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, it is hereby
DIRECTED that , as part of the investigation to ascertain representa-
tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Faultless Caster
Corporation, Evansville, Indiana, an election by secret ballot shall be
conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days
from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision
of the Regional Director for the Fourteenth Region , acting in this
matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject
to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among
the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who
were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the
date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during
said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily
laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United
States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding
those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause
and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the election, to deter-
mine whether or not they desire to be represented by United Electrical,
Radio & Machine Workers of America , affiliated with the Congress of
Industrial Organizations, for the purposes of collective bargaining.
Mn. GERARD D . REILLY took no part in the consideration of the above
Decision and Direction of Election.