Ex Parte Shaffer et alDownload PDFPatent Trial and Appeal BoardOct 7, 201411278885 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 7, 2014) Copy Citation UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ____________ Ex parte THOMAS H. SHAFFER, ROBERT G. STERN, and MARLA R. WOLFSON ____________ Appeal 2012-010515 Application 11/278,885 Technology Center 1600 ____________ Before DONALD E. ADAMS, ULRIKE W. JENKS, and ROBERT A. POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judges. ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL1 This appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involves claims 1, 4, 6–12, 15, and 17–22 (App. Br. 1). Examiner entered rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse. 1 The Real Party in Interest is Peach Technologies, LLC (App. Br. 1). Appeal 2012-010515 Application 11/278,885 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE The claims are directed to a bandage and treatment process for promoting skin health, skin healing, and tissue healing, wherein the process comprises applying Appellants’ bandage to a site on the skin or wound of an animal. Claim 1 is representative and is reproduced in the Claims Appendix of Appellants’ Brief. Claims 1, 4, 6–9, 11, 12, 15, 17–19, 21, and 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combination of Rosati,2 Stephens,3 and White.4 Claims 10 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combination of Rosati, Stephens, White, and Augustine.5 ISSUE Does the preponderance of evidence relied upon by Examiner support a conclusion of obviousness based on a finding that the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the prior art bandage’s reservoir is 0.0? FACTUAL FINDINGS (FF) FF 1. Examiner’s findings concerning the scope and content of the prior art are set forth on pages 7–13 of the Answer. FF 2. Examiner finds that “Rosati is silent regarding the amount and partial pressure of carbon dioxide and therefore it is considered to be atmospheric 2 Rosati, US 7,014,630 B2, issued Mar. 21, 2006. 3 Frederick O. Stephens & Thomas K. Hunt, Effect of Changes in Inspired Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Tensions on Wound Tensile Strength: An Experimental Study, 173 ANNALS OF SURGERY 515–519 (1971). 4 White, US 4,366,169, issued Dec. 28, 1982. 5 Augustine, US 5,964,721, issued Oct. 12, 1999. Appeal 2012-010515 Application 11/278,885 3 pressure, which is 0.0” mm Hg (Ans. 7 (emphasis added); see also id. at 14 (“when carbon dioxide is present it is at atmospheric pressure”)). FF 3. The atmospheric pressure of carbon dioxide is 0.3 mm Hg (Partial Pressures of Gases6). ANALYSIS Appellants’ independent claims 1 and 10 require a bandage comprising a reservoir that comprises carbon dioxide having a partial pressure of less than 0.1 mm Hg (see Appellants’ claims 1 and 10). Although Examiner asserts that Rosati’s wound dressing will have an amount of carbon dioxide that is equivalent to atmospheric pressure, Examiner fails to establish an evidentiary basis on this record to support a conclusion that the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is 0.0 mm Hg (see FF 2; Cf. FF 3; App. Br. 5 (“Examiner simply assumes that the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the reservoir would be the same as the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere”)). Notwithstanding Examiner’s assertion to the contrary, the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is 0.3 mm Hg, which is above that required by Appellants’ claimed invention (FF 3). Examiner failed to establish that the combination of Stephens and White, alone or in combination with Augustine, make up for the foregoing deficiency in Rosati. 6 Partial Pressures of Gases, http://www.diatronic.co.uk/nds/webpub/partial_ pressures.htm, last accessed Oct. 7, 2014. Appeal 2012-010515 Application 11/278,885 4 CONCLUSION OF LAW The preponderance of evidence relied upon by Examiner does not support a conclusion of obviousness based on a finding that the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the prior art bandage’s reservoir is 0.0. The rejection of claims 1, 4, 6–9, 11, 12, 15, 17–19, 21, and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combination of Rosati, Stephens, and White is reversed. The rejection of claims 10 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combination of Rosati, Stephens, White, and Augustine is reversed. REVERSED cdc Notice of References Cited Application/Control No. 11/278,885 Applicant(s)/Patent Under Reexamination Thomas H. Shaffer et al. Examiner Isis Ghali Art Unit 1600 Page 1 of 1 U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS * DOCUMENT NO. DATE NAME CLASS SUBCLASS DOCUMENT SOURCE ** APS OTHER A B C D E F G H I J K L M FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS * DOCUMENT NO. DATE COUNTRY NAME CLASS SUBCLASS DOCUMENT SOURCE ** APS OTHER N O P Q R S T NON-PATENT DOCUMENTS * DOCUMENT (Including Author, Title Date, Source, and Pertinent Pages) DOCUMENT SOURCE ** APS OTHER U Partial Pressures of Gases, http://www.diatronic.co.uk/nds/webpup/partial_pressures.htm, accessed Oct. 7, 2014. V W X *A copy of this reference is not being furnished with this Office action. (See Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, Section 707.05(a).) **APS encompasses any electronic search i.e. text, image, and Commercial Databases. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office PTO-892 (Rev. 03-98Notice of References Cited Part of Paper No. 16 PARTIAL PRESSURES OF GASES The partial pressure of a gas is a measure of the concentration of a gas in a mixture of gases The partial pressure (measured in mmHg or kPa) is the pressure that a particular gas exerts in a gas mixture. The pressure is caused by the impact of moving molecules against a surface. Gases which are dissolved in body fluids or tissues also have partial pressures. The dissolved gases move around and impact against surfaces exerting pressure in the same way a gas exerts its own partial pressure in a gas phase. Atmospheric pressure at sea level is approximately 760 mmHg Oxygen constitues 21 % of the atmospere, so its partial pressure is 21 % of 760 = 159 mmHg. Nitrogen constitutes 78 %, so its partial pressure is 78 % of 760 = 593 mmHg. Carbon dioxide constitutes only 0.04 %, so its partial pressure is 0.04 % of 760 = 0.3 mmHg. The partial pressure of each gas in the respiratory mixture forces gas molecules to dissolve into the alveolar membrane and then into the blood of the pulmonary capillaries FILL IN EVALUATION FORM Gas Partial pressure in inspired air Partial pressure in alveolar air H2O Variable 47 mmHg CO2 0.3 mmHg 40 mmHg O2 159 mmHg 105 mmHg N2 593 mmHg 568 mmHg Total 760 mmHg 760 mmHg The partial pressures in the alveolar air are as a result of gas exchange. All values are approximate. Page 1 of 2PARTIAL PRESSURES OF GASES 10/7/2014http://www.diatronic.co.uk/nds/webpub/partial_pressures.htm Conversely, the partial pressure of each gas already in solution in the blood means that some gas molecules escape back into the alveoli There is diffusion in both directions but it is the difference between the two partial pressures that determines the net direction of diffusion In the case of oxygen, PO2 in inspired air is 159 mmHg and is 40 mmHg in venous blood. The net direction of diffusion therefore is from the alveoli to the blood resulting in a PO2 in arterial blood of 95 mmHg. In the case of carbon dioxide, PCO2 in inspired air is 0.3 mmHg and is 46 mmHg in venous blood. The net direction of diffusion therefore is from the blood to the alveoli resulting in a PCO2 in arterial blood of 40 mmHg. Back to gaseous exchange in the alveoli Back to oxygen transport Page 2 of 2PARTIAL PRESSURES OF GASES 10/7/2014http://www.diatronic.co.uk/nds/webpub/partial_pressures.htm Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation