Ex Parte SANODownload PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesAug 8, 200208280823 (B.P.A.I. Aug. 8, 2002) Copy Citation THIS DOCUMENT WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION AND IS NOT BINDING PRECEDENT OF THE BOARD Paper No. 19 Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES MA IL' Do NAOTO SANO 411m Junior Party PAT & Tfo (Patent No. 5,567,928 BOARD OF PA T,ýýDFFICE ANDijVTQc Ap V. ER, e'CAýs t", AKIKAZU TANIMOTO Senior Party, (Application 08/956,007)2 Patent Interference No. 104,844 Before LEE, SPIEGEL and GARDNER-LANE, Administrative Patent Judges. LEE, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT Based on application 08/280,823, filed July 26, 1994. The real party in interest is Canon Kabushiki Kaisha. 2 Filed October 22, 1997. Accorded the benefit of application 08/834,851, filed April 10, 1997; application 08/409,935, filed March 23, 1995; application 08/256,000, filed June 8, 1994; and Japanese Patent No. 5-138489, filed June 10, 1993. The real party interest is Nikon Corporation. Interference No. 104,844 Sano v. Tanimoto On August 2, 2002, senior party Tanimoto filed a paper requesting entry of adverse judgment pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a). The request is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of the count is herein entered against senior AKIKAZU TANIMOTO; FURTHER ORDERED that senior party AKIKAZU TANIMOTO is not entitled to its application claims 5-56 which correspond to the count; FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper will be given a paper number and entered in the involved application or patent of the respective parties; and FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.666. 2 Interference No. 104,844 Sano v. Tanimoto ,ýZeson Lee dministrative Patent Judge) BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS Carol A.48ý5iefel AND Administrative Patent Judge) INTERFERENCES ASally aýrdner-Larne Administrative Patent Judge) 3 Interference No. 104,844 Sano v. Tanimoto By Federal Express: Attorney for junior party SANO: Anthony M. Zupcic, Esq. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO 30 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New York 10112-3801 Attorney for senior party TANIMOTO: Mitchell W. Shapiro, Esq. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C. 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 500 McLean, Virginia 22102 4 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation