Ex Parte Ralph et alDownload PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesJun 28, 200609660568 (B.P.A.I. Jun. 28, 2006) Copy Citation The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte DAVID RALPH, GANG AN, S. MARK O’HARA, and ROBERT VELTRI _______________ Appeal No. 2006-1623 Application 09/660,568 _______________ ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL _______________ Before FLEMING, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, HARKCOM, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge. Per curiam. On May 22, 2006, counsel for the appellants filed, among other documents, a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) under 37 CFR § 1.114. Pursuant to the notice entitled “Request for Continued Examination Practice and Changes to Provisional Application Practice,” 65 Fed. Reg. 50092, 50095 (Aug. 16, 2000), and the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.114(d), a request for continued examination under 37 CFR § 1.114 filed after appeal has been taken, but prior to a decision on the appeal, “will be treated as a Appeal No. 2006-1623 Application No. 09/660,568 Page 2 request to withdraw the appeal and to reopen prosecution of the application before the examiner.” Accordingly, the appeal in this application is dismissed. The application is being returned to the examiner for further action as may be appropriate. ) Michael R. Fleming, Chief ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Gary V. Harkcom, Vice Chief ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEAL ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Lora M. Green ) Administrative Patent Judge ) Richard A. Nakashima Fulbright & Jaworkis, LLP 600 Congress Avenue, Suite 1900 Austin, TX 78701 dem Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation