Ex Parte NuzziDownload PDFPatent Trial and Appeal BoardFeb 29, 201613050328 (P.T.A.B. Feb. 29, 2016) Copy Citation UNITED STA TES p A TENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR 13/050,328 03/17/2011 Frank Anthony Nuzzi 49845 7590 03/02/2016 SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER/EBAY P.O. BOX 2938 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 www .uspto.gov ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 2043.904US 1 2459 EXAMINER RIES, LAURIE ANNE ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 2176 NOTIFICATION DATE DELIVERY MODE 03/02/2016 ELECTRONIC Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the following e-mail address( es): USPTO@SLWIP.COM SLW@blackhillsip.com PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte FRANK ANTHONY NUZZI Appeal2014-002106 Application 13/050,328 Technology Center 2100 Before ELENI MANTIS MERCADER, CARL W. WHITEHEAD JR., and ADAM J. PYONIN, Administrative Patent Judges. MANTIS MERCADER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appeal2014-002106 Application 13/050,328 STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from a final rejection of claims 1-20. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm. THE INVENTION Appellant's claimed invention is directed to tracking web link usage of a user, in which a "request for a web page comprising a web link" is detected, "click history associated with the user" is accessed, and the web page is modified "utilizing the click history" (Abstract). Independent claim 1, reproduced below, is representative of the subject matter on appeal (with emphasis added): 1. A method comprising: receiving a request for a web page comprising a web link, the request associated with a user account; accessing click history associated with the user account, the click history storing a time-since-click value, the time- since-click value reflecting a measure of time since the web link was activated utilizing the user account; using at least one processor, modifying the web page utilizing the click history to generate a modified web page, the modified web page including a modified presentation of the web link, the modified presentation indicating that less than a predetermined amount of time elapsed since the last time the web link was activated; and serving the modified web page in response to the request for the web page. 2 Appeal2014-002106 Application 13/050,328 REFERENCES and THE REJECTION Claims 1-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over White (US 2012/0137201 Al; pub. May 31, 2012) in view of Hayashi (US 2002/0003534 Al; pub. Jan. 10, 2002). Ans. 2; Final Act. 3. ISSUE The pivotal issue is whether the Examiner erred in finding that the combination of White and Hayashi teaches the limitation of "the modified presentation indicating that less than a predetermined amount of time elapsed since the last time the web link was activated," as recited in claim 1. ANALYSIS We adopt the Examiner's findings in the Answer and add the following primarily for emphasis. Appellant argues that the combination of White and Hayashi fails to suggest "the modified presentation indicating that less than a predetermined amount of time elapsed since the last time the web link was activated," because "Hayashi calculates the time elapsed after a click on an icon and this value is then used to determine the position to which the icon is to be moved" (App. Br. 12). Appellant contends "the presentation of an icon or a thumbnail in Hayashi is not modified and also does not indicate in any way that less than a predetermined amount of time elapsed since 'the last time the web link was activated' or since any other event" (App. Br. 15; see also Reply Br. 2). We are not persuaded by Appellant's argument. The Examiner finds, and we agree, that "the calculation of an elapsed time following the clicking 3 Appeal2014-002106 Application 13/050,328 of an icon indicating a link is taught by Hayashi" (Ans. 9), that White teaches "specifically modifying a web page based upon a click history of web links" (Ans. 10), and "including changing the appearance of corresponding links on the web page" (Ans. 3). Additionally, the Examiner finds, and we agree, that White teaches "a click statistics database that stores historical information pertaining to user click history, including time period information" (Ans. 3, citing White i-f 46). This portion of White connects "current browsing history" to time periods such as "the current week," which itself indicates that less than a predetermined time of seven days has elapsed. We find one of ordinary skill in the art would pursue a limited number of solutions in which to convey an elapsed time as taught by Hayashi into the changed appearance of a link as taught by White, and one such solution is through a changed link appearance "indicating that less than a predetermined amount of time elapsed," as claimed by Appellant. We thus find the combination of White and Hayashi teaches the claimed limitation. See KSR Int'! Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 402--403 (2007). Accordingly, we sustain the Examiner's rejection of independent claim 1, as well as independent claims 11 and 20, and dependent claims 2- 10, and 12-19 which were not separately argued. CONCLUSION The Examiner did not err in finding that the combination of White and Hayashi teaches the limitation of "the modified presentation indicating that less than a predetermined amount of time elapsed since the last time the web link was activated," as recited in claim 1. 4 Appeal2014-002106 Application 13/050,328 DECISION The Examiner's decision rejecting claims 1-20 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED 5 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation