Ex parte MazharDownload PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesSep 30, 199908105984 (B.P.A.I. Sep. 30, 1999) Copy Citation Application for patent filed August, 10, 1993. 1 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MOHAMMAD S. MAZHAR ____________ Appeal No. 95-2687 Application No. 08/105,9841 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, KIMLIN, and HANLON, Administrative Patent Judges. HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge. ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING Appellant requests reconsideration of our decision dated August 24, 1999, in the above-identified appeal. According to appellant, the request for reconsideration is a request for clarification of that decision. The request for reconsideration is GRANTED. Appeal No. 95-2687 Application No. 08/105,984 2 Specifically, appellant "believes that the Board's decision leaves claims 9-12 of the application in a non- rejected status." Appellant requests confirmation of the status of claims 9-12. The decision on appeal mailed August 24, 1999, states (Paper No. 13, page 9) : The rejection of claims 1, 3-8 and 13-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as lacking descriptive support in the application, as originally filed, is AFFIRMED. The rejection of claims 1 and 3-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicants regard as the invention is REVERSED. Therefore, based on the record before us, claims 9-12 do not currently stand rejected under any section of Title 35 of the United States Code. GRANTED WILLIAM F. SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) Appeal No. 95-2687 Application No. 08/105,984 3 ) BOARD OF PATENT EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) lp Appeal No. 95-2687 Application No. 08/105,984 4 COMMANDER U.S. ARMY TANK-AUTOMOTIVE COMMAND ATTN: AMSTA-LP WARREN, MI 48397-5000 Leticia Appeal No. 95-2687 Application No. 08/105,984 APJ LEPIANE APJ KIMLIN APJ SMITH WILLIAM DECISION: GRANTED Send Reference(s): Yes No or Translation (s) Panel Change: Yes No Index Sheet-2901 Rejection(s): _____ Prepared: July 20, 2000 Draft Final 3 MEM. CONF. Y N OB/HD GAU PALM / ACTS 2 / BOOK DISK (FOIA) / REPORT Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation