Ex Parte Lee et alDownload PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesNov 15, 201010457322 (B.P.A.I. Nov. 15, 2010) Copy Citation UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________________ Ex parte JI UNG LEE, GEORGE EDWARD POSSIN, DOUGLAS ALBAGLI, and WILLIAM ANDREW HENNESSY ____________________ Appeal 2009-010104 Application 10/457,322 Technology Center 2600 ____________________ Before ALLEN R. MacDONALD, THOMAS S. HAHN, and CARL W. WHITEHEAD, JR., Administrative Patent Judges. MacDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL1 1 The two-month time period for filing an appeal or commencing a civil action, as recited in 37 C.F.R. § 1.304, or for filing a request for rehearing, as recited in 37 C.F.R. § 41.52, begins to run from the “MAIL DATE” (paper delivery mode) or the “NOTIFICATION DATE” (electronic delivery mode) shown on the PTOL-90A cover letter attached to this decision. Appeal 2009-010104 Application 10/457,322 2 STATEMENT OF CASE Introduction Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of claims 1-3, 5, and 7-9. Claims 4 and 6 have been cancelled. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). Exemplary Claim Exemplary independent claim 1 under appeal reads as follows: 1. An imager, comprising: a plurality of pixels disposed on a substrate in an imaging array pattern comprising rows and columns, each of said pixels comprising a respective photosensor coupled to a respective thin film switching transistor; a plurality of scan lines disposed at a first level with respect to said substrate along a first axis of said imaging array pattern, each row of pixels in said imaging array pattern having a respective scan line, each of said respective scan lines being coupled to a respective gate electrode in said thin film switching transistors for each pixel disposed along the respective row of pixels in said imaging array pattern; a plurality of data lines disposed at a second level with respect to said substrate along a second axis of said imaging array pattern, each column of pixels in said imaging array pattern having a corresponding data line, each of said respective data lines being coupled to a respective readout electrode in said thin film switching transistors for each pixel disposed along the respective column of pixels in said imaging array pattern, and a storage capacitor array comprising a plurality of capacitors disposed on the substrate, each of the plurality of capacitors comprising a first electrode, a second electrode and a dielectric disposed between the first electrode and the second electrode; the first electrode being coupled to a corresponding photosensor and a corresponding thin film switching transistor, and the second electrode coupled to a capacitor linear electrode. Appeal 2009-010104 Application 10/457,322 3 Rejections 1. The Examiner rejected claims 1-3, 5, 7, and 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Van Berkel, U.S. Patent 5,349,174. 2. The Examiner rejected dependent claim 9 as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the combination of Van Berkel with Appellants’ admitted prior art.2 Appellants’ Contention At page 8 of the Appeal Brief, Appellants contend that Van Berkel does not support a prima facie case of anticipation because: Van Berkel discloses coupling a capacitor in parallel with the photosensor (Fig.6). Specifically, Van Berkel discloses that a drain electrode of each TFT is connected to the parallel arrangement of the photosensitive element and capacitor (Column 8, lines 60-63). In Fig. 6 of Van Berkel, the photosensitive elements and the capacitors are connected in parallel in all pixels. Van Berkel further discloses that parallel arrangement is connected to a common line, which is connected to a reference potential. Van Berkel fails to disclose a capacitor with the first electrode coupled to a corresponding photosensor and a thin film switching transistor and the second electrode coupled to a capacitor linear electrode. Clearly, the capacitor and the photosensitive element are in a parallel arrangement. (See, FIG. 6). Van Berkel fails to disclose the first electrode coupled to a corresponding photosensor and a thin film switching transistor and the second electrode coupled to a capacitor linear electrode. 2 The rejection of dependent claim 9 under 103(a) is not separately argued from the rejection of the independent claim under 102(b). Appeal 2009-010104 Application 10/457,322 4 Issues on Appeal Whether the Examiner has erred in rejecting claims 1-3, 5, 7, and 8 as being anticipated; and Whether the Examiner has erred in rejecting claim 9 as being obvious. ANALYSIS We have reviewed the Examiner’s rejections in light of Appellants’ contentions that the Examiner has erred. We disagree with Appellants’ conclusions. We adopt as our own (1) the findings and reasons set forth by the Examiner in the action from which this appeal is taken and (2) the reasons set forth by the Examiner in the Examiner’s Answer in response to Appellants’ Appeal Brief (with the one exception set forth below). We concur with the conclusion reached by the Examiner. We disagree with the Examiner’s recognition that capacitor 241 and photodiode 120 are not coupled in parallel in Figure 3 of Appellants’ disclosure. Contrary to Appellants’ implications in the arguments, Appellants’ Specification explicitly states that the capacitors and diodes are connected in parallel. (Spec. ¶ [0014]). CONCLUSIONS (1) The Examiner has not erred in rejecting claims 1-3, 5, 7, and 8 as being anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). (2) The Examiner has not erred in rejecting claim 9 as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). (3) Claims 1-3, 5, and 7-9 are not patentable. Appeal 2009-010104 Application 10/457,322 5 DECISION The Examiner’s rejections of claims 1-3, 5, and 7-9 are affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(v). AFFIRMED babc GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY GLOBAL RESEARCH ONE RESEARCH CIRCLE BLDG. K1-3A59 NISKAYUNA, NY 12309 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation