Ex Parte HodgenDownload PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesAug 31, 200508617048 (B.P.A.I. Aug. 31, 2005) Copy Citation Paper 107 Not binding precedentBoxInterferences@USPTO.gov Tel: 571-272-9797 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Patent Interference No. 105,227 GARY D. HODGEN (5,691,314), Junior Party, v. MARC B. GARNICK, CHRISTOPHER J. MOLINEAUX, AND MALCOLM L. GEFTER (09/197,595), Senior Party. Entered: 31 August 2005 Judgment - Bd. R. 127 - Priority Before GRON, TORCZON, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges. PER CURIAM. In view of the decision (Paper 106) on Hodgen's response to the order to show cause, judgment is now entered against Hodgen. JUDGMENT JUDGMENT on priority is entered against Hodgen for the subject matter of Count 2, the sole count in the interference; CLAIMS 1-7 and 10-14 of Hodgen's involved 5,691,314 patent, which correspond to Count 2, shall be canceled; and A COPY of this judgment shall be entered in the administrative records of Garnick's 09/197,595 application and Hodgen's 5,691,314 patent. Interference No. 105,227 Hodgen v. Garnick Page 2 Paper 107 Notice: Agreements and understandings regarding the termination of an interference are subject to filing requirements under 35 U.S.C. 135(c). Notice: In the event of judicial review, note the requirements of Bd. R. 8(b). cc (via electronic mail): For Hodgen: Edward A. Meilman and Charles E. Miller of DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & OSHINSKY, LLP, New York City, New York. For Garnick: Jane E. Remillard and Giulio A. DeConti of LAHIVE & COCKFIELD, LLP, Boston, Massachusetts. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation