Ex Parte Hao et alDownload PDFPatent Trial and Appeal BoardDec 14, 201713871756 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 14, 2017) Copy Citation United States Patent and Trademark Office UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O.Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 13/871,756 04/26/2013 Lei Hao P019687-RD-SDJ 1073 65798 7590 MILLER IP GROUP, PLC GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION 42690 WOODWARD AVENUE SUITE 300 BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304 EXAMINER TRUONG, THOMAS ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 2834 MAIL DATE DELIVERY MODE 12/14/2017 PAPER Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte LEI HAO, CHANDRA S. NAMUDURI, THOMAS WOLFGANG NEHL, and JOHN C. MORGANTE Appeal 2017-001967 Application 13/871,756 Technology Center 2800 Before LINDA M. GAUDETTE, JEFFREY R. SNAY, and JENNIFER R. GUPTA, Administrative Patent Judges. SNAY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL1 Appellant2 appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1—4 and 6—18. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm. 1 We cite to the Specification (“Spec.”) filed April 26, 2013; Final Office Action (“Final Act.”) dated July 29, 2015; Appellant’s Appeal Brief (“App. Br.”) dated December 29, 2015; Examiner’s Answer (“Ans.”) dated September 21, 2016, and Appellant’s Reply Brief (“Reply Br.”) dated November 17, 2016. 2 Appellant is Applicant, GM Global Technology Operations LLC. Appellant identifies General Motors as the real party in interest. App. Br. 4. Appeal 2017-001967 Application 13/871,756 BACKGROUND The invention relates to an electric machine intended for use in a belted alternator starter system that is configured to provide low torque ripple. Spec. H 1, 6. According to Appellant, torque ripple is reduced when a ratio of the number of stator slots to the number of rotor bars is selected to prevent first and second order harmonics. Id. | 6. Claim 1 is illustrative: 1. An electric machine comprising: a stator including a number of stator slots separated by stator teeth, said stator further including a plurality of windings wound within the stator slots; and a rotor rotatably mounted within the stator and defining an air gap therebetween, said rotor including a number of spaced apart rotor bars positioned adjacent to the air gap, wherein a ratio of the number of stator slots to the number of rotor bars is selected using all of the following inequalities to prevent first and second order harmonics between the stator slots and the rotor bars; 3pCopy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation