Ex Parte DeLucasDownload PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesFeb 22, 200710160572 (B.P.A.I. Feb. 22, 2007) Copy Citation Paper 92 Filed by Motions Panel Filed: 22 February 2007 Mail Stop Interference P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Tel: 571-272-9797 Fax: 571-273-0042 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ BERNARD D. SANTARSIERO, RAYMOND C. STEVENS, PETER G. SCHULTZ, JOSEPH M. JAKLEVIC, DEREK T. YEGIAN, EARL CORNELL, ROBERT A. NORDMEYER, JIAN JIN, WILLIAM F. KOLBE, ARTHUR L. JONES, DONALD C. UBER1 Junior Party, (Patents 6,296,673, 6,630,006, 6,911,056, 6,932,845, 6,951,575, and 7,001,438), v. LAWRENCE JAMES DELUCAS, Senior Party, (Application 10/160,572). _______________ Patent Interference No. 105,403 _______________ Judgment — Merits — Bd.R. 127 Before Hanlon, Lane, and Nagumo, Administrative Patent Judges. Nagumo, Administrative Patent Judge. In view of the Board's Decision in Paper 91 and for the reasons given, it is: 1 Jin, Kolbe, Jones, and Uber are listed inventors only for patent 6,296,673. The remaining inventors are listed on all of Santarsiero's involved patents. Interference 105,403 Paper 92 Santarsiero v. DeLucas -2- ORDERED that Bernard D. Santarsiero, Raymond C. Stevens, Peter G. Schultz, Joseph M. Jaklevic, Derek T. Yegian, Earl Cornell, Robert A. Nordmeyer, Jian Jin, William F. Kolbe, Arthur L. Jones, Donald C. Uber are not entitled to a patent containing: claims 1-59 of U.S. Patent 6,296,673. FURTHER ORDERED that Bernard D. Santarsiero, Raymond C. Stevens, Peter G. Schultz, Joseph M. Jaklevic, Derek T. Yegian, Earl Cornell, and Robert A. Nordmeyer are not entitled to a patent containing: claims 1-84 of U.S. Patent 6,630,006; claims 1–62 of U.S. Patent 6,911,056; claims 1-118 of U.S. Patent 6,932,845; claims 1-42 of U.S. Patent 6,951,575; claims 1—82 of U.S. Patent 7,001,438. FURTHER ORDERED that Lawrence James DeLucas is not entitled to a patent to claims 47 and 48 of Application 10/160,572. FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment shall be entered in the records of: U.S. Patent 6,296,673, U.S. Patent 6,630,006, U.S. Patent 6,911,056, U.S. Patent 6,932,845, Interference 105,403 Paper 92 Santarsiero v. DeLucas -3- U.S. Patent 6,951,575, U.S. Patent 7,001,438, and U.S. application 10/160,572. FURTHER ORDERED that in the event of a settlement, the attentions of the parties are drawn to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd.R. 205. /Adriene Lepiane Hanlon/ ) ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) /Sally Gardner Lane/ ) BOARD OF PATENT SALLY GARDNER LANE ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) /Mark Nagumo/ ) MARK NAGUMO ) Administrative Patent Judge ) Interference 105,403 Paper 92 Santarsiero v. DeLucas -4- cc via electronic mail: Attorney for SANTARSIERO: John A. Bauer, Esq. Bruce J. Koch, Esq. FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP 666 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10103 jbauer@fulbright.com bkoch@fulbright.com Attorney for DELUCAS: R. Danny Huntington, Esq. Sharon E. Crane, Ph.D., Esq. BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP 2020 K. Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-1806 huntington@bingham.com crane@bingham.com Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation