Ex Parte CordingDownload PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesApr 7, 200510400067 (B.P.A.I. Apr. 7, 2005) Copy Citation Filed on March 27, 2003. Accorded the benefit of Application 09/909,262, filed July 19, 2001. The real party in1 interest is AFG Industries, Inc. Based on Application 09/877,697, filed June 9, 2001. The real party in interest is Anthony, Inc.2 THIS DOCUMENT WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION AND IS NOT BINDING PRECEDENT OF THE BOARD Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Paper No. 66 Mail Stop INTERFERENCE Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences United States Patent and Trademark Office P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 Tel: 571-272-4626 Fax: 571-272-0943 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ CHRISTOPHER R. CORDING Junior Party (Application 10/400,067)1 v. RICHARD J. RICHARDSON and BENNIE REED DOWNING Senior Party (Patent No. 6,606,832)2 _______________ Patent Interference No. 105,224 _______________ Before LEE, MEDLEY and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge. LEE, Administrative Patent Judge. Judgment – Motions – Bd. Rule 127 On April 1, 2005, in a decision on preliminary motions we held that all of junior party Cording’s claims corresponding to the count are unpatentable over prior art and some of senior party Richardson’s claims corresponding to the count are unpatentable over prior art. Because Interference No. 105,224 Cording v. Richardson 2 junior party Cording, whose involved case in this interference is an application, is left with no patentable claim that corresponds to the count, a priority determination is no longer necessary. Judgment will now be entered. It is ORDERED that judgment is herein entered against claims 124-138 of junior party CHRISTOPHER R. CORDING’s involved application 10/400,067, and that junior party CHRISTOPHER R. CORDING is not entitled to claims 124-138 of its involved application 10/400,067; FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is herein entered against claims 8-10 and 27 of senior party RICHARD J. RICHARDSON and BENNIE REED DOWNING’s involved Patent No. 6,606,832, and that senior party RICHARD J. RICHARDSON and BENNIE REED DOWNING is not entitled to claims 8-10 and 27 of its involved Patent No. 6,606,832; FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd. Rule 205; FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be filed in the respective involved application or patent of the parties. April 7, 2005 Interference No. 105,224 Cording v. Richardson 3 By Facsimile: Counsel for junior party Cording: 202-783-6031 (Fax) Martin M. Zoltick, Esq. ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C. 1425 K Street, N.W. Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20005 Counsel for senior party Richardson: 650-849-6666 (Fax) Jerry D. Voight, Esq. FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. 700 Hansen Way Palo Alto, California 94304 Interference No. 105,224 Cording v. Richardson 4 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation