Ex Parte CarnevaliDownload PDFPatent Trial and Appeal BoardApr 24, 201712589737 (P.T.A.B. Apr. 24, 2017) Copy Citation United States Patent and Trademark Office UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O.Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 12/589,737 10/28/2009 Jeffrey D. Carnevali NPI-105 2616 24692 7590 Charles J. Rupnick 4742 - 42nd Ave. SW Suite 494 Seatlle, WA 98116-4553 04/26/2017 EXAMINER GRABOWSKI, KYLE ROBERT ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 3725 NOTIFICATION DATE DELIVERY MODE 04/26/2017 ELECTRONIC Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the following e-mail address(es): rupnick@comcast.net PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte JEFFREY D. CARNEYALI Appeal 2015-004292 Application 12/589,737 Technology Center 3700 Before JILL D. HILL, LISA M. GUIJT, and BRENT M. DOUGAL, Administrative Patent Judges. DOUGAL, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellant appeals under 35U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of claims 1—20. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We AFFIRM and designate a NEW GROUND OF REJECTION pursuant to our authority under 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b). Appeal 2015-004292 Application 12/589,737 CLAIMED SUBJECT MATTER The claims are directed to a magnetically enhanced clipboard and a method of forming such a clipboard. Claims 1, 7, and 12 are independent. Claim 1, reproduced below, is illustrative of the claimed subject matter: 1. A magnetically enhanced clipboard, comprising: a clipboard casing defining an outer wall and an inner wall, the outer wall comprising means for retaining a pad of pages of writing paper proximate to a writing surface thereof; an interior cavity defined by the inner wall and substantially enclosed thereby; and a magnet retained within the interior cavity in a position substantially against the inner wall proximate to the outer wall adjacent to the writing surface. REJECTIONS Claims 1—6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (a) as being anticipated by Summerhayes (US 2009/0206592 Al, pub. Aug. 20, 2009). Claims 7—20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) as being unpatentable over Summerhayes and Weinhaus (US 4,287,676, iss. Sept. 8, 1981). OPINION Appellant argues that the rejections are improper because Summerhayes does not quality as prior art. See Appeal Br. 9-13. The Examiner rejects claims 1—6 over Summerhayes under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (a). Final Act. 3. The relevant portion of 35 U.S.C. § 102 states “A person shall be entitled to a patent unless — (a) the invention was . . . described in a printed publication in this . . . country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for patent.” 2 Appeal 2015-004292 Application 12/589,737 Summerhayes was published as a printed publication on August 20, 2009. Summerhayes, Title Page. The present Application was filed on October 28, 2009. Spec., Statement of Deposit. Thus, if Appellant’s invention occurred before August 20, 2009 Summerhayes does not qualify as prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (a). In the context of 35 U.S.C. § 102 (b), the section after § 102 (a), but also defining when “[a] person shah be entitled to a patent,” the Supreme Court has provided guidance concerning how to determine when “invention” occurs. Pfaff v. Wells Elecs., Inc., 525 U.S. 55 (1998). That case dealt with an offer of sale for a device for mounting and removing semiconductor chip carriers. Id. at 58. The inventor “provided the manufacturer with a description and drawings that had ‘sufficient clearness and precision to enable those skilled in the matter’ to produce the device,” before reducing the invention to practice, such as by making and testing a prototype. Id. at 63 (Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation