Ex Parte AlmbergDownload PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesSep 13, 201110225203 (B.P.A.I. Sep. 13, 2011) Copy Citation UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 10/225,203 08/22/2002 Christian Almberg 010315-165 3523 7590 09/13/2011 Ronald L. Grudziecki BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHIS, L.L.P. P.O. Box 1404 Alexandria, VA 22313-1404 EXAMINER STEPHENS, JACQUELINE F ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 3761 MAIL DATE DELIVERY MODE 09/13/2011 PAPER Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________________ Ex parte CHRISTIAN ALMBERG ____________________ Appeal 2009-013497 Application 10/225,203 Technology Center 3700 ____________________ Before: JENNIFER D. BAHR, FRED A. SILVERBERG, and WILLIAM V. SAINDON, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appeal 2009-013497 Application 10/225,203 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-4, 6, 10-14, and 16-191 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Forgar (WO 01/00129 A1, pub. Jan. 4, 2001) and Brock (US 4,041,203, iss. Aug. 9, 1977). Appellant’s representative presented oral argument on September 8, 2011. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). SUMMARY OF DECISION We REVERSE. THE INVENTION The claims are directed to an absorbent article provided with a pair of belt members which render the article comfortable to wear and which are resistant to tearing. Spec., paras. 2 and 6. Claim 1, reproduced below, is illustrative of the claimed subject matter. 1. An absorbent article comprising: a liquid permeable topsheet, a liquid impermeable backsheet, and an absorbent body enclosed therebetween, said article having a front portion, a rear portion and a crotch portion therebetween, and further is provided with a pair of belt members attached to one of the rear portion and the front portion of the article and which are intended to 1 Appellant added claim 19 in the Amendment filed November 28, 2006. Although claim 19 does not appear in any claim listing in subsequent amendments, Appellant also does not appear to have explicitly canceled claim 19. Appellant and the Examiner appear to disagree as to the status of claim 19. See Ans. 3 (including claim 19 in the statement of rejection) and App. Br. 8 n. 1. We leave to the Examiner and Appellant clarification as to the status of claim 19. Appeal 2009-013497 Application 10/225,203 3 be fastened together around a waist of a wearer by fasteners and where the other one of said front portion and said rear portion is provided with fasteners adapted to be fastened to the belt members, in such a way that the article will assume a pant shape, the belt members form a part of a waist portion of the pant, the belt members comprise a flexible laminate of at least three layers of fibrous material bonded together in a bonding pattern, one of said layers having an external surface acting as an attachment surface for said fasteners, said bonding pattern having a bonding area of no more than 10% and a density of bonding sites of between 1 and 15 bonding sites per cm2, and said laminate having a tear strength of at least 22 N; wherein said laminate comprises an inner layer of a soft and skin friendly fibrous material, an outer layer that is creped, and a middle layer that is more tear resistant than the inner and outer layers. OPINION Appellant’s independent claim 1 requires the laminate of the belt members to comprise an outer layer that is creped. The Examiner found that “Forgar/Brock does not disclose the outer layer is creped.” Ans. 5. In order to make up for that deficiency, the Examiner reasoned that “[i]t would have been an obvious matter of design choice to crepe the outer layer since the three-dimensional structure disclosed in Forgar and the creped outer layer solves the same problem of an improved gripping surface.” Ans. 5-6. The Examiner adds that, since Forgar’s three-dimensional structure provides the same function as the structure of Appellant’s invention (i.e., creating an improved gripping surface), Forgar’s laminate structure “is functionally equivalent to the present invention.” Ans. 8. The Examiner then cites a Appeal 2009-013497 Application 10/225,203 4 principle of law directed to product-by-process claims, but does not elaborate on how, if at all, the stated principle applies to the present case. Id. A dispositive issue raised in this appeal is whether the Examiner has established a prima facie case that it would have been obvious to modify Forgar so as to have a belt member laminate comprising an outer layer that is creped. As pointed out by Appellant, the Examiner has explicitly acknowledged that neither Forgar nor Brock discloses creping the outer layer. See App. Br. 10. Neither has the Examiner cited any evidence showing that a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of Appellant’s invention would have appreciated that creping the outer layer of the belt would create an improved gripping surface. Accordingly, the Examiner’s articulated reason for the modification lacks a rational underpinning, and thus cannot support the conclusion of obviousness of the subject matter of claim 1 or its dependent claims.2 DECISION For the above reasons, the Examiner’s decision is reversed. REVERSED 2 Rejections on obviousness grounds must be supported by “some articulated reasoning with some rational underpinning” to combine the known elements in the manner required in the claim at issue. In re Kahn, 441 F.3d 977, 988 (Fed. Cir. 2006), cited with approval in KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 418 (2007). Appeal 2009-013497 Application 10/225,203 5 hh Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation