Ex Parte 6168598 et alDownload PDFPatent Trial and Appeal BoardJan 11, 201990013580 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 11, 2019) Copy Citation UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARKOFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 90/013,580 09/04/2015 6168598 2087-204059 1037 126543 7590 01/14/2019 Farney Daniels, PC 800 S Austin Avenue, Suite 200 Georgetown, TX 78626 EXAMINER DAWSON, GLENN K ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 3993 MAIL DATE DELIVERY MODE 01/14/2019 PAPER Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________________ BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ____________________ Ex parte VITE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC Appellant ____________________ Appeal 2018-003409 Reexamination Control 90/013,580 Patent 6,168,598 B1 Technology Center 3900 ____________________ Before RAE LYNN P. GUEST, Administrative Patent Judge. ORDER BOARD RULE 41.35(b)(5) On September 21, 2018, a Decision on Appeal was entered in this reexamination proceeding (hereinafter “Decision”) which reversed the Examiner’s rejections of claims 21 and 77–94 under 35 U.S.C. § 112 first paragraph as failing to comply with the written description requirement, and under 35 U.S.C. § 112 second paragraph as being indefinite. Dec. 3–8. The Board entered new grounds of rejection of claims 77, 82, and 90–92 under 35 U.S.C. § 112 second paragraph as being indefinite, and under 35 U.S.C. § 112 first paragraph as failing to comply with the written description requirement, in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b). Id. at 8–11. The Decision also states: Appeal 2018-003409 Reexamination Control 90/013,580 Patent 6,168,598 B1 2 This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) (2011). 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) provides “[a] new ground of rejection pursuant to this paragraph shall not be considered final for judicial review.” 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) also provides that Appellant, WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the following two options with respect to the new ground of rejection to avoid termination of the appeal as to the rejected claims: (1) Reopen prosecution. Submit an appropriate amendment of the claims so rejected or new evidence relating to the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter reconsidered by the Examiner, in which event the prosecution will be remanded to the Examiner. . . . (2) Request rehearing. Request that the proceeding be reheard under § 41.52 by the Board upon the same record. . . . Id. at 10–11. With respect to the new grounds of rejection of claims 77, 82, and 90– 92, Patent Owner had the option to file either a request for reopening of prosecution or a request for rehearing within two months from the date of the Decision in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) to avoid termination of the appeal as to the rejected claims. See Dec. 8–11. Because Patent Owner did not timely file either a request to reopen prosecution or a request for rehearing, the appeal proceeding has terminated as to the rejection of claims 77, 82, and 90–92. See 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b); MPEP § 1214.06(IV). In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 41.35(b)(5), the jurisdiction of the Board ends when Appellant fails to take any required action under 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.39(b), 41.50(a)(2), 41.50(b), or 41.50(d), and the Board enters an order of dismissal. Accordingly, it is so ordered that the appeal of the Appeal 2018-003409 Reexamination Control 90/013,580 Patent 6,168,598 B1 3 rejections of claims 77, 82, and 90–92 is dismissed pursuant to § 41.35(b)(5). Because the Board’s Decision of September 21, 2018, reversed the Examiner’s rejections of the balance of the appealed claims, the reexamination proceeding is before the Examiner for immediate action in accordance with MPEP § 1214.04. ORDER In view of the foregoing, the appeal is DISMISSED as to claims 77, 82, and 90–92. The reexamination proceeding is before the Examiner for the next Office communication, as appropriate. PATENT OWNER: Farney Daniels, PC 800 S Austin Avenue, Suite 200 Georgetown, TX 78626 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation