Evette Carto, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 25, 2006
01a61873 (E.E.O.C. May. 25, 2006)

01a61873

05-25-2006

Evette Carto, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Evette Carto,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A61873

Agency No. 4K230013805

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated January 6, 2006, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., and

Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act),

as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. In her complaint, complainant

alleged that she was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race

(African-American), sex (female), color (Black), and disability (Lumbar

disorder and strain) when:

1. On January 11, 2005 complainant was denied upward mobility

opportunities;

2. On April 29, 2005 complainant was denied upward mobility opportunities;

3. In May 2005 complainant became aware of her nonselection for the

Associate Supervisor Program; and

4. On unspecified dates complainant was not given the opportunity to be

an Acting Supervisor.

The agency dismissed the complaint on the grounds that complainant's

filing of the formal complaint was untimely. The agency noted that

on August 25, 2005 complainant was mailed her notice of her right

to file her discrimination complaint, giving her 15 days to file a

formal complaint. The agency further noted that she did not file her

formal complaint until December 16, 2005, which is beyond the 15-day

limitation period. The agency further found that, as regards issue 1,

complainant's counselor contact on June 2, 2005 was beyond the 45-day

limitation period for an incident that occurred on January 11, 2005.

Finally, the agency found that issues 1 and 4 were raised in an earlier

EEO complaint with the agency that was subsequently settled.

We note initially that where, as here, there is an issue of timeliness,

"[a]n agency always bears the burden of obtaining sufficient

information to support a reasoned determination as to timeliness." Guy,

v. Department of Energy, EEOC Request No. 05930703 (January 4, 1994)

(quoting Williams v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05920506

(August 25, 1992)). In addition, in Ericson v. Department of the Army,

EEOC Request No. 05920623 (January 14, 1993), the Commission stated

that "the agency has the burden of providing evidence and/or proof to

support its final decisions." See also Gens v. Department of Defense,

EEOC Request No. 05910837 (January 31, 1992). In the instant case, the

agency has provided insufficient evidence that complainant received the

August 25 right-to-file notice. The agency maintains that a handwritten

note on complainant's right-to-file notice establishes that she received

it on October 9, 2005. The Commission finds, however, that it would be

speculative to conclude that the unsigned handwritten note is evidence

of receipt by complainant on the date indicated. We therefore find that

the agency has not met its burden of establishing that complainant's

formal complaint is untimely.

As regards issues 1 and 4, we note that the regulation set forth at 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides that an agency may dismiss a complaint

where the complainant has raised the same claim that is pending before or

has been decided by the agency or the Commission. The agency maintains

that issues 1 and 4 were raised in a previous complaint that has since

been settled. We note, however, that the agency has provided no evidence

to support such a claim. Finally, as regards issue 1, we find that

the agency correctly dismissed this issue for untimely EEO counselor

contact since the EEO counselor's report reveals that complainant did

not contact an EEO counselor contact until June 6, 2005, which is beyond

the 45 day limitation period. We therefore AFFIRM the FAD as regards

issue 1, and VACATE the FAD as regards issues 2, 3, and 4, and REMAND

for further development as outlined below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process claims 2, 3, and 4 in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact

on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0900)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until

such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 25, 2006

__________________

Date

2

01A61873

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036