Eugenio Bermudez, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 6, 2009
0120072271 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 6, 2009)

0120072271

08-06-2009

Eugenio Bermudez, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Eugenio Bermudez,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120072271

Hearing No. 510-2006-00158X

Agency No. 1H-341-0012-05

DECISION

Complainant appeals to the Commission from the agency's decision

dated March 2, 2007, finding no discrimination. In his complaint,

dated October 25, 2005, complainant alleged discrimination based on sex

(male) and disability (back & neck) when on September 2, 2005, he was

informed not to report to his new bid assignment on September 3, 2005,

because no work was available for him

After completion of the investigation of the complaint, complainant

requested a hearing but later withdrew the request. The agency

then issued its decision concluding that it asserted legitimate,

nondiscriminatory reasons for its action, which complainant failed to

rebut.

After a review of the record, the Commission, assuming arguendo that

complainant had established a prima facie case of discrimination, finds

that the agency has articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons

for the alleged incident. The agency stated that during the relevant

time period at issue, complainant was employed as a Transfer Clerk,

assigned to a modified limited duty job due to his medical restrictions

since December 27, 2004. The agency indicated that in spite of this

limited duty assignment, complainant bid on a Ramp Clerk's job for which

he was not physically qualified. The agency noted that it was not clear

how complainant's bid made it through the system in view of that, but

it did mistakenly. However, when it became apparent that complainant

was slated to begin a job for which he had permanent restrictions,

the Supervisor of Distribution Operations told him that he would not be

able to fill the job. Complainant acknowledged that he could perform

all the duties and responsibilities of the Ramp Clerk position except

for a weight lifting restriction, i.e., lifting up to 35 pounds.

Assuming (without deciding) that complainant was an individual with a

disability, the Commission finds that complainant failed to show that

the agency action was motivated by discrimination. It is noted that

complainant has not claimed that he was denied a reasonable accommodation.

To the extent that complainant may be alleging that he was denied a

reasonable accommodation, we find that complainant has not shown that

he was denied a reasonable accommodation. Complainant was clearly

assigned to a modified position and despite his claim, it is noted that

complainant was not entitled to an accommodation of his choice, i.e.,

other employees' assistance lifting the weightier packages. There is no

indication that he was required to work beyond his medical restrictions.

Accordingly, the agency's decision finding no discrimination is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

8/6/09

__________________

Date

2

0120072271

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013