Ernesto Perez, JR, Complainant,v.Dr. Donald C. Winter, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 3, 2009
0120092354 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 3, 2009)

0120092354

09-03-2009

Ernesto Perez, JR, Complainant, v. Dr. Donald C. Winter, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Ernesto Perez, JR,

Complainant,

v.

Dr. Donald C. Winter,

Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120092354

Agency No. 094523A01143

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated April 27, 2009, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely

EEO Counselor contact. In his complaint, complainant alleged that he was

subjected to discrimination on the basis of national origin (Hispanic)

when:

1. On December 15, 2008, he received the ratings of 3, 4, and 3 on his

individual objectives with an overall rating of 3 on his fiscal year

2008 annual performance; and

2. On December 3, 2008, his department head refused to upgrade his

position to YC-110203.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of

discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment

Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the

matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel

action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action.

The Commission has adopted a "reasonable suspicion" standard (as opposed

to a "supportive facts" standard) to determine when the forty-five (45)

day limitation period is triggered. See Howard v. Department of the Navy,

EEOC Request No. 05970852 (February 11, 1999). Thus, the time limitation

is not triggered until a complainant reasonably suspects discrimination,

but before all the facts that support a charge of discrimination have

become apparent.

EEOC Regulations provide that the agency or the Commission shall extend

the time limits when the individual shows that he was not notified of the

time limits and was not otherwise aware of them, that he did not know

and reasonably should not have known that the discriminatory matter or

personnel action occurred, that despite due diligence he was prevented

by circumstances beyond his control from contacting the Counselor within

the time limits, or for other reasons considered sufficient by the agency

or the Commission.

The record discloses that the alleged discriminatory events occurred on

December 3, and 15, 2008, but complainant did not initiate contact with

an EEO Counselor until March 3, 2009, which is beyond the forty-five

(45) day limitation period. The record further discloses complainant's

acknowledgement in writing that he received but disagreed with his

December 15, 2008 performance evaluation as further evidence that

complainant had or should have had reasonable suspicion of discrimination

prior to his EEO contact on March 3, 2009. Concerning claim 2,

complainant argues that his failure to be promoted is a continuing harm;

however, the Commission finds that complainant's failure on December 3,

2008 to be upgraded to a higher position is a discrete act triggering

complainant's duty to initiate the EEO process. On appeal, complainant

restates arguments previously made and argues the merits of the case with

respect to the reasons why he should have received a higher performance

appraisal and why he should have been promoted. The Commission finds

that complainant has failed to present persuasive arguments or evidence

warranting an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO Counselor

contact.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (X0408)

The Commission has referred your case back to the Merit Systems Protection

Board so that it can take additional evidence. Upon receipt of that

evidence, the Commission will issue a decision on the merits of your case.

You may have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United

States District Court after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days

from the date on which you filed your Petition for Review with the

Commission, even if there has been no decision by the Commission on the

merits of your case. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 3, 2009

__________________

Date

2

0120092354

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

4

0120092354