Ernestine S. Boswell, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southeast Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 22, 2011
0520110311 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 22, 2011)

0520110311

07-22-2011

Ernestine S. Boswell, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southeast Area), Agency.




Ernestine S. Boswell,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Southeast Area),

Agency.

Request No. 05-2011-0311

Appeal No. 0120103712

Agency No. 1H374002410

DENIAL

Complainant timely requested that the Commission reconsider its decision

in Ernestine S. Boswell v. U.S. Postal Serv., EEOC Appeal No. 0120103712

(Feb. 3, 2011) (Boswell I). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission

may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous

Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1)

the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a

substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the

agency. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(b). For the reasons that follow,

Complainant’s request is DENIED.

In Boswell I, the Commission found, in relevant part, that the Agency

properly dismissed Complainant’s formal complaint of discrimination

because Complainant failed to bring the matter to the attention of an

EEO counselor within 45 days as required by our regulations. See EEOC

Regulation § 1614.105(a)(1). Specifically, we found that Complainant

reasonably suspected discrimination on the date she was allegedly forced

out of her bid position, that is, March 22, 2010. We then found that

the date on which Complainant contacted an EEO counselor, May 13, 2010,

was beyond the 45th day of the alleged discriminatory event and therefore

untimely.

In her request for reconsideration, Complainant contends that the Agency

is to blame for the timeliness issue because it would not let her see

her representative. However, she provides no evidence to support this

notion. There is nothing in the record to support a finding that the

Agency prevented Complainant from seeing her representative or otherwise

stood in the way of Complainant’s right to contact an EEO counselor

and her responsibility to do so within 45 days.

After reconsidering the previous decision and the entire record,

the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of

29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to

DENY the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120103712 remains

the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative

appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission’s decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

“Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and

not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 22, 2011

Date

2

05-2011-0311

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013