Erich E. Lachmann, Complainant,v.William S. Cohen, Secretary, Department of Defense, Agency

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 17, 2000
05a00054 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 17, 2000)

05a00054

04-17-2000

Erich E. Lachmann, Complainant, v. William S. Cohen, Secretary, Department of Defense, Agency


Erich E. Lachmann v. Department of Defense

05A00054

April 17, 2000

Erich E. Lachmann, )

Complainant, )

) Request No. 05A00054

v. ) Appeal No. 01975804

) Agency No. DIS -90-170-14-R

) DIS 91-196-14-R

William S. Cohen, ) Hearing No. 170-96-8113X

Secretary, ) 170-96-8114X

Department of Defense, )

Agency )

)

)

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

On October 12, 1999, Erich E. Lachmann (complainant)/the United States

Department of Defense (agency) initiated a request to the Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission (Commission) to reconsider the decision in

Erich E. Lachmann v. United States Department of Defense, EEOC Appeal

No. 01975804 (September 2, 1999).<1> EEOC Regulations provide that

the Commissioners may, in their discretion, reconsider any previous

Commission decision. 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to be codified

and hereinafter referred to as EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b)).

The party requesting reconsideration must submit written argument

or evidence which tends to establish one or more of the following

two criteria: the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material fact or law; or the decision will have a

substantial impact on the policies, practices or operations of the

agency. Complainant's request is denied.

After a review of complainant's request for reconsideration, the

Commission finds that complainant received the Commission's previous

decision on September 7, 1999 and filed a request for an extension

to file a request for reconsideration on October 12, 1999. Since the

Commission does not grant extensions for requests for reconsideration,

the Commission will treat complainant's request for as his actual request

for reconsideration. Volume 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be

codified at and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.402(a)),

provides in relevant part, that a complainant must file his or her

request for reconsideration within thirty days of receipt of the

decision on appeal. Here, the Commission finds that the complainant

did not file his request for reconsideration within the thirty days

allotted pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. Furthermore, complainant

has not provided any reasons on request why the limitations period

should be extended pursuant to Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be

codified at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). Therefore, it is the decision of the

Commission to deny complainant's request. The decision in EEOC Appeal

No. 01975804 (September 2, 1999) remains the Commission's final decision.

There is no further right of administrative appeal on a decision of the

Commission on this Request for Reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P1199)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN

THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the

Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in

which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must

be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right

to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

April 17, 2000

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.