Eric A. Shrader, Complainant,v.Daniel R. Glickman, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 22, 2000
05980154 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 22, 2000)

05980154

09-22-2000

Eric A. Shrader, Complainant, v. Daniel R. Glickman, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.


Eric A. Shrader v. Department of Agriculture

05980154

09-22-00

.

Eric A. Shrader,

Complainant,

v.

Daniel R. Glickman,

Secretary,

Department of Agriculture,

Agency.

Request No. 05980154

Appeal No. 01961499

DECISION

On December 4, 1997, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

(Commission) received a request from Eric A. Shrader (hereinafter referred

to as complainant) to reconsider the decision in Eric A. Shrader v. Dan

Glickman, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, EEOC Appeal No. 01961499

(November 3, 1997), received by complainant on November 6, 1997.

EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion,

reconsider any previous decision where the party demonstrates that:

(1) the previous decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of

material fact or law; or (2) the decision will have a substantial impact

on the policies, practices, or operation of the agency. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.405(b).<1>

After a review of complainant's request for reconsideration, the previous

decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that complainant's

request does not meet the criteria in 29 C.F.R. �1614.405(b). Therefore,

it is the decision of the Commission to deny complainant's request.<2>

The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01961499 (November 3, 1997) remains

the Commission's final decision. The agency shall comply with the

provisions of the Order set forth below. There is no further right of

administrative appeal on a decision of the Commission on this Request

for Reconsideration.

ORDER

1. To the extent that it has not already done so, the agency shall

specifically enforce the terms of the settlement agreement dated January

28, 1994, insofar as it pertains to the June 10, 1993 memorandum at issue

in Complaint No. 95-0504. The agency shall neither include nor reference

that memorandum in any subsequent matters, including any collateral

proceedings which might arise involving complainant or any other party.

2. The agency is ORDERED to process Complaint No. 95-0131 in accordance

with 29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded complaint within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests

a final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final

decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgement to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer, as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0800)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order

prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29

C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the

complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (Q0400)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed AND that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing In the alternative, you may file a civil action AFTER

ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission.

If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE

COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD,

IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

__________________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

____09-22-00______________________________

Date

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify

that the decision was mailed to claimant, claimant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_________________________

Date

_________________________

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply

to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.

2The Commission notes that while complainant asserted, in his formal

complaints and on appeal, that the named management officials created

a hostile work environment, we do not find the incidents at issue to

be sufficiently severe or pervasive to state a claim of harassment.

See Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 114 S.Ct. 367 (1993) (citing

Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986)).