ENLOW et al.v.QUOTSCHALLA et al.Download PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesFeb 23, 199808129704 (B.P.A.I. Feb. 23, 1998) Copy Citation Patent 5,342,978, issued August 30, 1994, based on Application 08/066,695,1 filed May 24, 1993. Assigned to General Electric Company, Pittsfield, Mass. Application 08/129,704, filed September 30, 1993. Accorded benefit of2 Application 3105/92-6, filed October 5, 1992. Assigned to Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Tarrytown, NY. 1 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ WILLIAM P. ENLOW and LEO L. VALDISERRI Junior Party1 v. UDO QUOTSCHALLA and HELMUT LINHART Senior Party2 __________ Interference No. 103,609 Before DOWNEY, WILLIAM F. SMITH and WEIMAR, Administrative Patent Judges. DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judge Interference No. 103,609 2 JUDGMENT On February 9, 1998, Enlow et al., the junior party, filed pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a) a request for entry of an adverse judgment as to all the claims which correspond to the count in this interference (Paper No. 35). Accordingly, JUDGMENT as to the subject matter of the count in issue is hereby awarded to Udo Quotschalla and Helmut Linhart, the senior party. Accordingly, William P. Enlow and Leo J. Valdiserri, the junior party, are not entitled to their patent containing claims 1-9 corresponding to the count. MARY F. DOWNEY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT WILLIAM F. SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) ELIZABETH C. WEIMAR ) Administrative Patent Judge ) Interference No. 103,609 3 Boris Haskell 2316 So. Eads Street Arlington, VA 22202 John T. Miller, Esquire WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK 2033 “k” Street, N.W., Ste. 800 Washington, DC 20006 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation