Empire State Silk Label Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsAug 1, 194242 N.L.R.B. 1209 (N.L.R.B. 1942) Copy Citation In the Matter Of PHILMER B EVES AND H J ANDRESEN, AS ExEcu- TORS OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF ALBERT K BuirL, NOW DECEASED , FORMERLY ' DOING BUSINESS ' UNDER THE" TRADE NAME AND STYLE OF EMPIRE STACIE SILK LABEL Co and FEDERATION OF WOVEN LABEL & NARROW FABRIC WORKERS, A F or L , Case No R-3997.-Decided August 1, 1912 Jurisdiction : woven label manufacturing industry Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question dis- pute as to ' appiopiiate unit, election necessary Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining . all weavers and learners in the weaving department of the Company, excluding foremen, unit based upon extent of organization Mr. A. Bernard King, of New York City, for Co-Executor H. J. Andresen, and Mr Arthur F Simonson, of Staten Island, N. Y , for Co-Executor Philmer B Eves. Mr Charles Ehrentraut, of Paterson, N J., for the Union Miss Melvern R. Krelow, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon petition and amended petition duly filed by Federation of Woven Label & Narrow Fabric Workers, A F. of L ,1 herein called the Union, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of Philmer B. Eves and H J. Andresen, as Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Albert K Buhl, now deceased, formerly doing business under the trade name and style of Empire State Silk Label Co., Staten Island, New -York, -'herein- called the Company, the National Labor Rela- tions Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Martin I. Rose, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held I The Trial Examiner , without objection by the parties , granted a motion to correct ,the title on all the formal pleadings to read as set forth above At a convention on June 21, 1942, the name of the Union was changed from Federation of Woven Label Workers, A F of L to Federation of Woven Label & Narrow Fabric Workers, A F of L 42NLRB , No222 1 1209 0 1210 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD at New York City, on June 25, 1942 The Company and the Union appeared, participated, and were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues During the hearing, the Company moved that the petition be dismissed on the ground that the Union had failed to prove by competent evidence that the weavers consti- 'iute an appropriate bargaining unit: At the conclusion of`the'hear- ing, the Company moved that in the-event the Board does not find the Union's alleged unit appropriate, the petition be dismissed. The Tiial Examiner reserved rulings on these motions They are hereby denied The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following. FINDINGS OF FACT N I THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Philmer B -Eves and H J Andresen, executors under the last will and testament of Albeit K Buhl, deceased, are engaged at a plant at 386 Clove Road, Staten Island, New York, in care yi ng on the business of the decedent, namely, the manufacture, sale, and distribution of woven labels During the 6 months preceding the hearing, the Com- pany purchased raw materials valued in excess of $10,000, of which, approximately 60 percent was shipped to the plant from points outside the State of New York During the same period, the Company man- ufactured products valued in excess of $10,000, of which approxi- mately 70 percent was shipped to points outside the State of New York. The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the mean- ing of the National Labor Relations Act II TIIE ORGANIZAIION INVOLVED Federation of Woven Label & Narrow Fabric Workers is a labor organization affiliated with the American Federation of Labor. It admits to member ship employees of the Company , III THE QUESTION CONCERNING RFPRESENIATION On April 13, 1942, the Union notified the Company that it repre- sented a majority of the Company's weavers and requested a confer- ence At a conference held on or about May 7, 1942, the Company took the position that the,question of appioprrate,unit should be sub- mitted to the Board for determination - A report prepared by the Regional Director and introduced in evi- dence at the hearing indicates that the Union represents a substantial O PHILMER B EVES AND H 'J" ANDRESEN, EXECUTORS 1211 number of employees of the Company inn the''uhlt' hereinafter found 'to be appropi late 2 ' , - I We find that a question affecting- cbnimei ce' has arisen concerning the representation of employees of tile' Company, irithin the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) wind (7) of the Act `IV THE APPROPRIATE' UNIT The Union contends that all weavers and learners in the Company's weaving department, excluding foremen, constitute an appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bargaining 'It argues that weav- ing is a skilled operation requiring approximately'3 years of training for proficiency The Company denies that weaving is highly skilled It contends that its operations aie interdependent and integrated and that the unit should consist of all the employees at'its plant, including office workers and' supervisory employees The manufacturing operations of the ^CQnnpany's 'plant include, in addition to the weaving of labels, auxiliary operations such as design- ing, warping, winding, card cutting, and card lacing The Company employs approximately 29 weavers who work on a piece-rate basis.3 Other production employees, numbering approximately 66, are on an hourly late The weavers are higher,paid,than any other employees engaged in production work Although workers engagedin the auxiliary , operations are eligible to membership in the Union, the Union has 'restricted its organizing to the employees of the weaving clepal tment in pursuance of a policy first to organize the "major" department,of the plant There is no evidence that the other employees of` the Company belong to any union; nor has any other labor 'Organ ization,petition ed the Board for certification as repiesentative of'the Company's employees on a plant- wide basis Thus, even if, under other. circumstances, the weavers and learners in the -weaving clepartnnent would not constitute the most effective bargaining uit, nevertheless,, m, the existing circumstances, unless they aie recognized as a separate unit, tlrei e will be no collective bargaining agent whatsoever for these workers Under the circumstances, including the existing state of organiza- tion among the employees of the Company, and ,without prejudice 2 The Regional Director repotted that the Union submitted its membership roll book which contained the names of 17 members and the dates on which the initiation fees and dues were paid Of the 17 members, 11 joined the Union on 'August 4, 1941, 1 on October 4 , 1941, 2 on February 14, 1942 , 2 on March 14, 1942 , and 1 has been a member, of the Union for a number of years and was a carry -over from brother shop All 17 are ilassrfled as wea%eis The Company 's pay roll1for the week ending April 30, 1942 , showed that there are 29 weavers employed Of the 17 merhbers , 15 were employed by the Com- pany The Union has no members in any other department The Company also employs learners who ultimately become weavers At the time of the hearing , however , none was employed 1212 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD to a reconsideration of the appropriate- unit, at a , later stage, in - employee self organization, we find that all weavers and learners in the weaving department of the Company, excluding foremen, consti- tute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining, within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V THE..DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em- ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay- roll period immediately preceding the date of our Direction of Elec- tion herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By viitue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective baigaining with Philmei B Eves and H J. Andresen as executors of the Last Will and Testament of Albert K Buhl, now deceased, formeily doing business under the trade name and style of Empire State Silk Label Co, Staten Island, New York, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days fiom the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Second Region, acting in this mattei, as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately pieceding4he date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said period because they were ill or on vacation or in the active military service or training of the United States, or temporarily laid off, but excluding employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause; to determine whether or not they desire to be'represented by Federation of Woven Label & Narrow Fabric Workers, A F of L. for the purposes of collective bargaining. MR. GERARD D REILLY took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Election Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation