Ellen E. Spillane, Appellant,v.Rodney E. Slater, Secretary, Department of Transportation, (Federal Aviation Administration), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 31, 1999
01982653 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 31, 1999)

01982653

03-31-1999

Ellen E. Spillane, Appellant, v. Rodney E. Slater, Secretary, Department of Transportation, (Federal Aviation Administration), Agency.


Ellen E. Spillane, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01982653

) Agency No. 3983024

Rodney E. Slater, )

Secretary, )

Department of Transportation, )

(Federal Aviation Administration), )

Agency. )

______________________________ )

DECISION

Based on a review of the record, we find that the agency improperly

dismissed appellant's complaint, pursuant to EEOC Regulation 29

C.F.R. �1614.107(a), for failure to state a claim when allegedly she

failed to raise a basis of discrimination which is protected under the

Civil Rights laws and regulations administered by this Commission.

A review of the record shows that appellant generally alleges that she

experienced harassment and a hostile work environment for over a two

year period. Additionally, she specifically identifies an incident of

alleged discriminatory discipline on September 22, 1997, when she was

sent home immediately after a co-worker informed the manager that she

was on the phone with an EEO counselor complaining about harassment and

a hostile work environment. The manager followed her out the door to

ensure that she left the office.

The agency argues that this cannot be considered reprisal for engaging in

protected EEO activity because the manager disciplined appellant for the

negative content of the conversation, not because an EEO counselor was

at the other end of the line. We note that appellant subsequently met

with the EEO counselor, and clearly stated reprisal in connection with

the September 22, 1997, telephone call as the basis for her complaint.

Therefore, we find that the agency's dismissal of appellant's complaint

for failing to state a basis was improper. See Osborne v. Department

of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05960111 (July 19, 1996).

In fact, a fair and careful reading of all of appellant's statements

indicates that she is also raising a mental disability (anxiety and

depression) as a basis for the alleged discrimination. We note that

it is well settled that additional bases may be raised at any time by

appellant during the EEO process. See Lastre v. Department of Veterans

Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05910862 (December 30, 1991).

Therefore, we find that appellant has sufficiently identified both

reprisal and mental disability, as the bases of her complaint. Moreover,

we construe the complaint as alleging both an incident of discriminatory

discipline on September 22, 1997, and a continuing violation based on

harassment and hostile work environment.

Accordingly, we VACATE the FAD and REMAND the allegations, as reformulated

above, to the agency in accordance with this decision and the ORDER below.

ORDER (E1092)

The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded allegations in accordance

with 29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the appellant

that it has received the remanded allegations within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to

appellant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify appellant

of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days

of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise

resolved prior to that time. If the appellant requests a final decision

without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty

(60) days of receipt of appellant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and a copy

of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights

must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action.

The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled �Right to File

A Civil Action.� 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.10.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be

submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will

consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in

very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604.

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish

to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in

an appropriate United States District Court. It is the position of

the Commission that you have the right to file a civil action in an

appropriate United States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. You should be aware,

however, that courts in some jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil

Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that a civil action must be

filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive

this decision. To ensure that your civil action is considered timely,

you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision or to consult an attorney concerning

the applicable time period in the jurisdiction in which your action

would be filed. In the alternative, you may file a civil action AFTER

ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission.

If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE

COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD,

IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(C.F.R.).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file

a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed

within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File

A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

March 31, 1999

____________________________

DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director

Office of Federal Operations