Elizabeth J. Paszko, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 27, 2004
01a40802 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 27, 2004)

01a40802

02-27-2004

Elizabeth J. Paszko, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Elizabeth J. Paszko v. United States Postal Service

01A40802

February 27, 2004

.

Elizabeth J. Paszko,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A40802

Agency No. 1E-554-0014-03

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

improperly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely

EEO Counselor contact.

On December 27, 2002, complainant initiated contact with an EEO Counselor.

Informal efforts to resolve her concerns were unsuccessful.

In her formal complaint, filed on March 1, 2003, complainant alleged

that she was subjected to discrimination on the bases of disability and

age when on May 18, 2002, she was placed in a residual vacancy without

regard to her medical restrictions.

In its final decision dated October 17, 2003, the agency dismissed the

complaint for untimely EEO Counselor contact.

Complainant argues on appeal that her delay in contacting an EEO Counselor

with regard to her assignment to the residual vacancy was due to not

being informed of the limitation period for contacting an EEO Counselor.

Complainant claims that in December 2002, when she approached the

union for help the union told her to file an EEO complaint and she

then contacted the EEO Counselor. The agency has presented no evidence

that EEO posters were on display, nor has the agency otherwise refuted

complainant's contention that she lacked knowledge of the applicable

limitation period for contacting an EEO Counselor. Where, as here,

there is an issue of timeliness, "[a]n agency always bears the burden of

obtaining sufficient information to support a reasoned determination as

to timeliness." Guy v. Department of Energy, EEOC Request No. 05930703

(January 4, 1994) (quoting Williams v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request

No. 05920506 (August 25, 1992)). In addition, in Ericson v. Department

of the Army, EEOC Request No. 05920623 (January 14, 1993), the Commission

stated that the agency has the burden of providing evidence and/or proof

to support its final decisions. See Gens v. Department of Defense,

EEOC Request No. 05910837 (January 31, 1992).

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is VACATED and the complaint is REMANDED for further processing

as ordered below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ORDERED to conduct a supplemental investigation with regard

to the issue of whether complainant had actual or constructive notice

of the time limitation for contacting an EEO Counselor. If an EEO poster

was displayed at complainant's work facility during the relevant period,

the agency shall supplement the record with a copy of the poster and/or

provide an affidavit from an agency official who has personal knowledge

of the existence of the posters. Thereafter, the agency shall either

issue a notice of processing or a final decision, within forty-five

calendar days from the date that this decision becomes final. A copy

of the notice of processing or final agency decision must be sent to

the Compliance Officer, as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 27, 2004

__________________

Date