Edward E. Baker, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 7, 2000
01994022 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 7, 2000)

01994022

08-07-2000

Edward E. Baker, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Edward E. Baker v. United States Postal Service

01994022

August 7, 2000

Edward E. Baker, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01994022

) Agency No. 1-J-605-0005-99

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from a final

agency decision (FAD) pertaining to his complaint of unlawful employment

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.<1> We accept the appeal pursuant

to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified at 29 C.F.R. �

1614.405)

After unsuccessful EEO counseling, complainant filed a formal complaint

on March 15, 1999, claiming that he was subjected to sex discrimination

when he received a Notice of Proposed Removal (NOPR) in August 1998.

In its FAD, the agency dismissed the complaint, finding that it was moot

in light of the agency's recission of the NOPR, dated November 24, 1998.

On appeal, complainant submits evidence addressing the merits of his

claim. In response, the agency requests that we affirm its FAD.

Volume 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to be codified and hereinafter

cited as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(5)) provides for the dismissal of a

complaint when the issues raised therein are moot. To determine whether

the issues raised in complainant's complaint are moot, the factfinder

must ascertain whether (1) it can be said with assurance that there is

no reasonable expectation that the alleged violation will recur; and

(2) interim relief or events have completely and irrevocably eradicated

the effects of the alleged discrimination. See County of Los Angeles

v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631 (1979); Kuo v. Department of the Navy, EEOC

Request No. 05970343 (July 10, 1998). When such circumstances exist,

no relief is available and no need for a determination of the rights of

the parties is presented.

Review of the record reveals a document prepared by a senior staff

member of the EEO Complaints Processing office stating that complainant

filed a grievance, and that the agency had rescinded the NOPR without

complainant losing time from work. However, the record before us contains

only the agency's letter rescinding the NOPR, and not the NOPR itself.

Moreover, the record does not contain any documentation associated with

the grievance referenced above. Moreover, the Notification of Personnel

Action contained in the record is dated April 8, 1998, which is prior

to the NOPR, and so fails to disclose any personnel action associated

with the NOPR or the subsequent recission. Accordingly, we are unable

to verify whether or not complainant lost any time, pay, or any other

benefits with respect to the issuance of the NOPR, or whether the NOPR

was expunged from his personnel record by virtue of the recission.

Moreover, complainant stated that the NOPR was issued in connection

with leave he used at the time of his mother's death. Therefore,

clarification is necessary regarding whether complainant is requesting

compensatory damages. See Yancey v. Department of Health and Human

Services., EEOC Request No 05931195 (July 20, 1994); Glover v. USPS,

EEOC Appeal No. 01930696 (December 9, 1993).

Therefore, given the present record, as discussed above, we find that

a supplemental investigation is necessary in order to determine whether

the recission �completely and irrevocably eradicated the effects of the

alleged discrimination.� Accordingly, the agency decision is VACATED

and the complaint is REMANDED to the agency for further processing in

accordance with this decision and the Order below.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to take the following action:

The agency is ORDERED to conduct a supplemental investigation to obtain

a copy of the NOPR, a copy of all grievance documentation, and a copy

of all pertinent Notifications of Personnel Actions, and to associate

this information with the complaint file. The agency is also ORDERED

to provide evidence to show whether or not the NOPR was expunged from

complainant's personnel file, and also to obtain clarification from

complainant regarding whether he is requesting compensatory damages as

a remedy.

Thereafter, the agency will issue a final decision or notify complainant

that the agency is processing his complaint. The supplemental

investigation and issuance of the final decision or notice of processing

must be completed within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this

decision become final. A copy of the agency new final decision or notice

of processing must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1199)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the

complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order,

the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a

civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior

to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408), and 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a

civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph

below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407

and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the

underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �

2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the complainant files a civil action,

the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409).

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0400)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN

THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

August 7, 2000

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_______________ __________________________

Date Equal Employment Assistant

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to

all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the

revised regulations found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where

applicable, in deciding the present appeal. The regulations, as

amended, may also be found at the Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.