Eduardo A. Mendez, Complainant,v.Janet Napolitano, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 17, 2009
0520090631 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 17, 2009)

0520090631

09-17-2009

Eduardo A. Mendez, Complainant, v. Janet Napolitano, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Agency.


Eduardo A. Mendez,

Complainant,

v.

Janet Napolitano,

Secretary,

Department of Homeland Security,

Agency.

Request No. 0520090631

Appeal No. 0120091250

Agency No. HS07CIS002025

Hearing No. 550-2008-00368X

DENIAL

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Eduardo

A. Mendez v. Department of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. 0120091250

(July 16, 2009). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its

discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision

where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision

involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

(2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

In our prior decision, the Commission affirmed that agency's finding

of no discrimination. See id. The agency had implemented an AJ's

summary judgment decision, finding that complainant failed to show the

agency's reason (i.e. complainant's lacking performance) was pretext

for discrimination. On appeal, complainant did not establish that there

were material facts in dispute nor that the agency's explanations were

pretext.

In his request complainant argues, for the first time, that there are

genuine issues of material fact. Specifically, complainant disputes

that he conducted interviews without an interpreter, failed to fill

out necessary paperwork, and kept applicants late. Further, complainant

contends that the agency ignored his improved performance between February

and June 2007. Complainant asserts that the agency did not have a

legitimate reason for terminating his employment. However, we remind

complainant that a "request for reconsideration is not a second appeal

to the Commission." Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

110 for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (Nov. 9, 1999), Chapter 9.

After reconsidering the previous decision and the entire record, the

Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny

the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120091250 remains the

Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative

appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0408)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil

action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph

above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 17, 2009

__________________

Date

3

0520090631

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013