Edna M. Doak, Appellant,v.Donna A. Tanoue, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 5, 1999
01992531 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 5, 1999)

01992531

11-05-1999

Edna M. Doak, Appellant, v. Donna A. Tanoue, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Agency.


Edna M. Doak v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

01992531

November 5, 1999

Edna M. Doak, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01992531

) Agency No. 94-37

Donna A. Tanoue, )

Chairman, )

Federal Deposit Insurance )

Corporation, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

The appellant timely filed an appeal with this Commission from a final

decision, dated November 12, 1998, which the agency issued pursuant to

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a) and (d). The Commission accepts

the appellant's appeal in accordance with EEOC Order No. 960, as amended.

In a prior decision on this complaint, the Commission found that the

agency properly dismissed allegations B, C, F, and G because the appellant

had raised the allegations in a previously filed grievance, dated March

17, 1994. However, the Commission remanded the complaint because the

agency failed to address allegations A, D, and E when dismissing the

appellant's complaint. Doak v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,

EEOC Appeal No. 01975817 (October 9, 1998).

The agency then issued a new final agency decision, wherein it again

dismissed allegations A, D, and E. The decision found that allegation

A was inextricably intertwined with the March 17, 1994 grievance.

The decision found that allegations D and E failed to state claims.

The Commission finds that the agency erred when it dismissed allegation A.

Allegation A concerned a letter of warning issued on February 1, 1994.

In contrast, the grievance concerned a March 2, 1994 final determination

which sustained the imposition of a l0- day suspension. The grievance

described the suspension as the latest punitive action in a series of

actions taken against the appellant. However, the grievance did not

challenge the imposition of the letter of warning or seek to have it

retracted and expunged. Accordingly, the Commission finds that the

appellant did not challenge the letter of warning in the grievance.

Therefore, the Commission reverses the agency's dismissal of allegation

A.

The Commission finds that the agency also erred when it dismissed

allegation D. Allegation D alleges that the appellant's supervisor

attempted to prevent the appellant from seeing her psychiatrist by

threatening to record her as absent without approved leave (AWOL) on

February 4, 1994. On February 1, 1994, the same supervisor had issued the

letter of warning regarding the appellant's leave usage; the supervisor

also had charged the appellant as being AWOL for 4 hours on February 2,

1994, and as being AWOL for 5 hours on February 3, 1994. If allegation

D were to be proven true, then the supervisor had placed the appellant

in the dilemma of either forgoing treatment for her alleged disability

or, in all probability, to incur another charge of AWOL. Therefore,

the Commission finds that allegation D states a claim of a denial of a

requested accommodation, even though it appears that the supervisor later

chose not to charge the appellant with AWOL for seeing the psychiatrist.

A remedy for a proven denial of a reasonable accommodation would be, among

other things, to require the granting of the accommodation in the future.

The Commission finds that the agency further erred when it dismissed

allegation E. Allegation E concerned an instance where the supervisor

denied the appellant's request to use February 7, 1994, in lieu of her

Compressed Work Schedule (CWS) day, while permitting a male employee to

change his CWS day. The Commission finds that this allegation states

a claim of disparate treatment in the terms and conditions of the

appellant's employment.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated above, the Commission REVERSES the agency's

dismissal of allegations A, D, and E and REMANDS the appellant's June 30,

1994 complaint for continuation of processing where the processing had

ceased.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to issue to appellant a copy of the investigative

file and also shall notify appellant of the appropriate rights within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless

the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the appellant

requests a final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a

final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of appellant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and a copy

of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights

must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you

have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some

jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner

suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your

civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN

THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision

or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the

jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,

you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR

DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your

appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME

AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY

HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME

AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

11/05/1999

______________

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations