Edgardo D.,1 Complainant,v.Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southern Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Nov 13, 2019

2019005558 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 13, 2019)

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013

Edgardo D.,1
Complainant,

v.

Megan J. Brennan,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service
(Southern Area),
Agency.

Appeal No. 2019005558

Agency No. 4G-335-0216-19

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC
or Commission) from the Agency's decision dated August 8, 2019, dismissing his complaint of
unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant was an employee at the
Agency’s Post Office in Winter Haven, Florida.

On July 31, 2019, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him
to discrimination on the bases of race (Caucasian), disability, and reprisal when: (1) on or about
April 19, 2019, he was terminated from his postal position due to unsatisfactory job
performance; and (2) on or about May 15, 2019, he became aware that his on-the-job injury was
not reported to the Department of Labor.

The Agency dismissed the claims pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO
counselor contact. It also dismissed claim 2 for failure to state a claim.

1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name
when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website.
2019005558

2
The instant appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

Claim 1 - Untimely EEO Counselor Contact

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of discrimination should
be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five
(45) days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel
action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action.

The record discloses that the alleged discriminatory event occurred on April 19, 2019, but
Complainant did not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor until June 27, 2019, which is
beyond the forty-five (45) day limitation period. On appeal, Complainant has presented no
persuasive arguments or evidence warranting an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO
Counselor contact.

Claim 2 – Failure to State a Claim

An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee or applicant for employment
who believes that he or she has been discriminated against by that agency because of race, color,
religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.103, .106(a). The
Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one
who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment
for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049
(April 21, 1994). When the complainant does not allege he or she is aggrieved within the
meaning of the regulations, the agency shall dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim
pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1).

Here, we concur with the Agency that Complainant failed to allege sufficient facts, which if
proven true and considered together, would establish that he suffered harm or loss with respect to
a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. To the extent
Complainant alleges that management did not properly file his worker’s compensation claim, he
must raise such matters with the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Department of
Labor, not here. The complaint, as written, without more, simply does not state a viable claim of
discrimination or unlawful retaliation.

To the extent Complainant raised additional claims in his appeal, he must first raise them with an
Agency EEO counselor if he wishes to pursue them.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

2019005558

3
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0617)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or
the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish
that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact
or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or
operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of
Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision. A party
shall have twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party’s timely request for
reconsideration in which to submit a brief or statement in opposition. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405;
Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110),
at Chap. 9 § VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the
Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Complainant’s request may be submitted via regular mail to P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC
20013, or by certified mail to 131 M Street, NE, Washington, DC 20507. In the absence of a
legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail
within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The
agency’s request must be submitted in digital format via the EEOC’s Federal Sector EEO Portal
(FedSEP). See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(g). The request or opposition must also include proof of
service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration
as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any
supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The
Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very
limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within
ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action,
you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or
department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do
so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the
national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the
administrative processing of your complaint.

2019005558

4
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)
If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may
request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or
costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may
request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of
court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The
court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter
the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to
File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).
FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations

November 13, 2019
Date