Eddie Cheris, Petitioner,v.Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary, Department of State, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 22, 2009
0320090066 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 22, 2009)

0320090066

07-22-2009

Eddie Cheris, Petitioner, v. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary, Department of State, Agency.


Eddie Cheris,

Petitioner,

v.

Hillary Rodham Clinton,

Secretary,

Department of State,

Agency.

Petition No. 0320090066

MSPB No. DC0752070195I1

DENIAL OF CONSIDERATION

On May 26, 2009, petitioner filed a petition with the Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission asking for review of a Final Order issued

by the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) concerning his claim of

discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of

1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.

In an appeal to the MSPB, petitioner alleged that he was discriminated

against on the basis of disability when he was removed from his position

of Information Assistant. Petitioner was removed on the charges of failure

to comply with instructions and being absent without leave. On March 8,

2007, a MSPB Administrative Judge (AJ) issued an initial decision finding

no discrimination and upholding the removal. Petitioner petitioned the

full Board for review. On June 26, 2007, the Board denied his petition.

On May 26, 2009, petitioner filed the instant petition, seeking review of

the MSPB decision. Petitioner asserts he recently acquired information

concerning his cases and he became aware that "something with this case

went way off course from its original submittal." Petitioner also states

he recently learned his attorney had been disbarred.

The Commission notes that both of the Board's decisions gave petitioner

appeal rights to the Commission, including the requirement that he file

a petition for review within thirty days of his receipt of the MSPB

decision. Therefore in order to be considered timely, petitioner had to

file his petition with this Commission by no later than approximately

August 1, 2007. As noted, petitioner's petition for review was filed in

May 2009, almost two years later.

Petitioner has failed to offer sufficient reason for his delay. To that

extent the Commission notes that the record includes information that

as early as January 2007, petitioner was aware of problems with his

attorney, stated that the attorney had a drinking problem, and that he

"would be looking for another lawyer to handle the case." In any event,

the Commission's regulations have made it clear that petitioner is

at all times responsible for going forth with his case. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.605(e).

Accordingly, the Commission denies the petition for review as untimely

filed.

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0408)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 22, 2009

__________________

Date

2

0320090066

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0320090066