E.A. Laboratories, Inc.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Oct 24, 1949

86 N.L.R.B. 711 (N.L.R.B. 1949)

In the Matter of E. A. LABORATORIES, INC., and UNITED AUTOMOBILE,
AIRCRAFT AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA,
C. I. O. LOCAL 844 and INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE,
AIRCRAFT AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA,
C. 1. 0.
October 24,1919
AMENDED DECISION
AND
ORDER
October 24,1949
On July 14, 1947, Trial Examiner Charles W. Schneider issued his
Intermediate Report in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that
the Respondent had engaged in and was engaging in certain unfair
labor practices,' and recommended that it cease and desist therefrom
and take certain affirmative action, as set forth in the Intermediate
Report. The Trial Examiner also found that the Respondent had
not engaged in other unfair labor practices alleged in the complaint
and recommended dismissal of those allegations. Thereafter, the
Respondent, the Union, and the attorney for the Board filed exceptions
to the Intermediate Report and supporting briefs.2
On November 23, 1948, the Board issued its Decision and Order
in this proceeding in which it found that the Respondent had engaged
in and was engaging in certain unfair labor practices and dismissed
the complaint with respect to allegations of other unfair labor prac-
tices. Matter of E. A. Laboratories, 80 N. L. R. B. 625.
On September 15, 1949, the Board issued a Notice to Show Cause,
stating that, unless on or before September 26, 1949, proper cause
to the contrary were shown, the Board would issue, as its Amended
Decision and Order, a Proposed Amended Decision and Order attached
thereto. Thereafter, the Respondent filed its Reply to Notice to
' The provisions of Section 8 (1), (2), (3 ), and (5 ) of the National Labor Relations
Act, which the Trial Examiner found were violated , are continued in Section 8 (a) (1), (2),
( 3), and (5) of the Act, as amended.
2 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the Act, as amended , the National Labor
Relations Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three -member
panel [Chairman Herzog and Members Houston and Gray].
86 N. L. R. B., No. 121. 711
712 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Show Cause. We have considered the Respondent's contentions set
forth in its reply and find that they are without merit.
The Board hereby issues the following as its Amended Decision
and Order in this proceeding :
1. The Respondent contends that the 1944 strikers are not entitled.
to back pay because the strikers breached the no-strike clause of the
contract by engaging in the strike and the strike was not caused by
any unfair labor practice or breach of contract on the part of the-
Respondent. We find it unnecessary to determine the cause of the 1944
strike or to pass upon the question as to whether the strike constituted.
a breach of the contract for the reasons hereinafter indicated. In any
event, as the Trial Examiner found, whether or not the strikers had
been discharged, by its agreement to reinstate the strikers on Novem-
ber 10, 1944, the Respondent waived or condoned the strikers' alleged
misconduct in engaging in the strike, and, on the next day the Re-
spondent refused to reinstate the strikers who appeared for work at
the plant pursuant to the agreement, although their jobs were then
vacant.3 Moreover, prior to November 10, 1944, as the Trial Examiner
found, the Respondent discharged only the union officials and certain
more active union members and not the remainder of the striking
employees; on the contrary, it had repeatedly offered them reemploy-
ment with full seniority rights, provided that they abandoned the
Union and their leaders. Under these circumstances and at that time,
namely, November 10, 1944, no further condonation was necessary as
to them because the Respondent's willingness to continue their em-
ployee status and reemploy them constituted a prior waiver of the
Respondent's privilege to discipline them for their alleged misconduct.
Apart from the waiver or condonation of November 10, 1944, there-
fore, the Respondent waived or condoned the alleged misconduct of
the strikers by repeatedly recognizing and treating them as having
employee status long after the commission of the alleged misconduct.
Therefore, when Union Representative Newman, in the criminal pro-
ceedings, told Judge Liebowitz that, "we had done so once before
3 The Trial Examiner found that the strikers refused to return to work unless the Re-
spondent recognized the Union and that the Respondent declined to reinstate the strikers
unless they abandoned the Union as their current bargaining representative. Ile further
found that the 1944 strike was caused, in part, by the Respondent's violation of Section S-
(5) of the Act. This violation consisted of making unilateral changes in working condi-
tions and of adopting an arbitrary attitude in dealing with the Union's grievance com-
mnittee. Even if we assume, arguenido, that the 1944 strike was caused, in part, by the-
Respondent's violation of Section 8 (5) of the Act, we are of the view that, by refusing
to return to work unless the Respondent recognized the Union, the strikers did not thereby
require removal of a cause of the strike as part of the price for its termination. The
Union was recognized as the statutory bargaining representative at the time of the out-
break of the strike. Thus, in refusing to reinstate the strikers unless they returned with-
out the Union as their bargaining representative, the Respondent unlawfully refused to-
recognize the Union and thereby sought to impose a new and illegal condition upon rein-
statement of the strikers.
E. A. LABORATORIES, INC. 713
[that is, attempted to return to work] and that we were only too.
anxious and glad to repeat it again," the fair intendment of his state-
ment is that he referred to his efforts to get the union leaders and more
active union members back to work, and not merely those whom the
Respondent had already indicated it was willing to take back. Ac-
-cordingly, we conclude that when President Auferio announced that
"these people can come back to work," he referred to the same group
.of employees as had Newman; that, at that point, the Respondent
waived its prior discharge of these union leaders and more active union
members, and, like the remainder of the striking employees, they
.became undischarged strikers whom the Respondent was bound to
:reinstate upon unconditional application; and that the Respondent's
refusal to do so on November 111 1944, when they applied for reinstate-
ment, was therefore unlawful. Under all the circumstances, we agree
with the Trial Examiner that the Respondent refused to reinstate
-the 1944 strikers on November 11, 1944, because of their union member-
ship and activities, and not because of any alleged misconduct on their
part, and that the Respondent thereby discriminated in regard to their
hire and tenure of employment to discourage membership in the
Union. Accordingly, we will direct that back pay for the 1944
strikers begin to run on November 11, 1944, and not on October 25,
1944, as the Trial Examiner recommended.
2. Like the Trial Examiner, we find that the strike of August 28,
1945, was caused by the Respondent's unfair labor practices. About
October 12, 1945, the Union voted to abandon the strike and advised
the striking employees to seek reinstatement to-their jobs. Some of
the strikers were reemployed ; others who applied were discrimina-
torily denied employment. A third group, for various reasons, failed
to apply. The Trial Examiner, by recommending that these strikers
be reinstated upon application, in effect determined that the strike was
still current as to them, and that their employee status continued
despite the lapse of time and the position taken by the Union. How-
ever, for reasons stated hereinafter, we need not determine whether
these strikers still retain their employee status, or whether the strike
is still current. The record shows that many of the strikers here
involved did not reapply in October 1945, because they believed that
such applications would be futile. Although we do not know why the
others who did not testify did not reapply, we cannot, in the present
state of the record, disentangle the various reasons which may be
applicable. As the Trial Examiner stated, all strikers who did not
reapply may still be interested in returning to work for the Respond-
ent. However, in view of the unfair labor practices found, there is
grave danger that the Respondent will not reemploy these strikers if
714 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
they apply, even though their former or substantially equivalent posi-
tions are open. In order to effectuate the policies of the Act, and to
remedy the unfair labor practices committed by the Respondent, we
shall require the Respondent to offer reinstatement, upon application,
to those strikers who have not heretofore applied for reemployment,
if such employment is available for them. In view of the length of
time which had elapsed at the time of the hearing since abandonment
of the strike without such applications having been made, we do not
thereby require the Respondent to displace any employee hired after
August 28, 1945, to provide employment for those strikers who did
not apply for reinstatement prior to the date of the hearing herein.
Those strikers for whom no such employment is immediately available
at the time of application shall be placed upon a preferential hiring
list with priority determined among them by such system of seniority
or other procedure as has heretofore been followed by the Respondent,
and shall, thereafter, in accordance with such list, be offered employ-
ment in their former or substantially equivalent positions as such
employment becomes available, and before other persons are hired for
such work. In the event that the Respondent hereafter fails or refuses
to reinstate any such striker in the manner stated above, the Respond-
ent shall pay him back pay for the period from the date employment
becomes available for such striker to the date of offer of reinstatement.
In the event that any such striker applied for reinstatement between
the date of the hearing and the date of the issuance of our Amended
Decision and Order, and the Respondent failed or refused to reinstate
such applicant although employment was available for him at the
time, the Respondent shall be required to pay him back pay from the
date of such refusal to reinstate to the date of offer of reinstatement.'
3. Joseph Stanco, Gaspar Russo, Ignazzio Chiappone, and Gilbert
Scandale testified that they did not desire reinstatement as of approxi-
mately August 1, 1946, February 1, 1946, December 25, 1945, and
August 12, 1946, respectively. In view thereof, we shall not direct
their reinstatement or placement upon a preferential list, as the case
may be, and shall award them, except Russo, who did not apply for
reinstatement, back pay for the period from the date when the
Respondent discriminated against each of them, to the date on which
each decided to reject reinstatement, respectively.5 In addition, we
4 The Respondent shall also place upon the preferential hiring list as described above,
without further application, any striker who applied for reinstatement between the date
of the hearing and the date of issuance of this Amended Decision and Order, for whom
no job was available when the application was made, and shall offer such strikers employ-
ment in their former or substantially equivalent positions as such employment becomes
available, and before other persons are hired for such work.
5 These dates , as well as others , do not appear in the record . These dates can be ascer-
tained in compliance proceedings if the parties are unable to reach agreement.
E. A. LABORATORIES, INC. 715
shall require the Respondent to pay back pay to Joseph Stanco, Ignaz-
zio Chiappone, Gilbert Scandale, and Gaspar Russo, from November
11, 1944, the date when the 1944 strikers were refused reinstatement,
to the date of their reinstatement.
4. Patsy Dearado testified that he did not desire reinstatement
after the 1945 strike unless the Respondent granted him a pay in-
crease. In view thereof, we shall not direct his reinstatement and
shall award him back pay for the period which elapsed from the time
that the Respondent refused to reinstate him until the date on which
he decided not to accept reinstatement unless the Respondent in-
creased his pay. In addition, we shall require the Respondent to
pay him back pay from November 11, 1944, to the date of his rein-
statement after the 1944 strike.
5. The record contains a statement by the Board's attorney that
he was advised by Egon Sorenson, one of the strikers whom the Re-
spondent refused to reinstate during the 1945 strike, that he did not
'desire reinstatement. Accordingly, we shall not require the Respond-
ent to reinstate Sorenson; however, the Respondent shall be required
to pay Sorenson back pay from the date of refusal to reinstate him to
the date when he decided to reject reinstatement.
6. Nicholas Cusanelli returned to work after the 1945 strike but
quit a short time thereafter because of dissatisfaction with his earn-
ings. Accordingly, we shall not reinstate Cusanelli and shall award
him back pay for the period from November 11, 1944, to the date of
his reinstatement and for the period which elapsed from the date
that the Respondent refused to reinstate him, following the 1945
strike, to July 1, 1946, when he returned to work for the Respondent.
7. Unlike the Trial Examiner, we do not find that the Respondent
-violated the Act by vilifying the Union and its officers or by com-
-pelling employees against their will to attend the July 3 meeting in
the plant.
8. Sometime after the Respondent refused to bargain collectively
in 1945, the International revoked the charter of Local 844, took over
its assets, and assumed its liabilities.6 Because the Trial Examiner
was of the opinion that Local 844 would be reestablished in the future,
he recommended that the Respondent be required to bargain with the
International and Local 844, with the proviso, however, in the event
Local 844 was not reestablished, that the Respondent "may petition
for modification of the order when it is prepared to comply with it."
We shall not require bargaining with Local 844 inasmuch as it has no
d So far as appears, no certification covering the Respondent's employees has ever is-
sued. The International and Local 844 were parties to the last contract with the Re-
spondent.
716 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
legal existence . Under the circumstances , in order to effectuate the
policies of the Act, we shall direct the Respondent , upon , request, to^
bargain collectively with the International.'
AMENDED ORDER
Upon the entire record in the case, and pursuant to Section 10 (c)
.of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor
Relations Board hereby orders that the Respondent, E. A. Laborato-
ries, 'Inc., Brooklyn, New York, and its officers, agents, successors,
and assigns shall:
1. Cease and desist from :
(a) Discouraging membership in International Union, United
Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of Amer-
ica, C. I. 0., or in any other labor organization of its employees, by
discharging or refusing to reinstate any of its employees, or in any
other manner discriminating in regard to their hire or tenure of em-
ployment; or any term or condition of their employment;
(b) Dominating or interfering with the administration of E. A.
Laboratories Employees' Association, or the formation or administra-
tion of any other labor organization of its employees, and from con-
tributing support to E. A. Laboratories Employees' Association or to
any other labor organization of its employees;
(c) Refusing , upon request, to bargain collectively with Interna-
tional Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Imple-
ment Workers of America, C. 1. 0., as the representative of its employ-
ees in the appropriate unit;
(d) In any other manner interfering with, restraining, or coercing
its employees in the exercise of the right to self -organization , to form
labor organizations , to join or assist International Union, United Auto-
mobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America,
C. I. 0., or any other labor organization, to bargain collectively
through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in con-
certed activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mu-
tual aid or protection, as guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action, which the Board finds will
effectuate the policies of the Act :
(a) Unless already reinstated, offer to the employees named in Ap-
pendix A hereto, Groups I and II, immediate and full reinstatement
to their former or substantially equivalent positions without prejudice
to their seniority and other rights and privileges, in the manner set
7 We base our order directing the Respondent to bargain upon the last refusal to bargain
collectively in 1945, as found by the Trial Examiner , and not upon any refusal to bargain
which occurred prior thereto.
E. A. LABORATORIES, INC. 717
forth in the section of the Intermediate Report entitled The remedy,
and hereinabove;
(b) Upon application, offer reinstatement to the persons named in
Appendix A, Group III, in the manner set forth hereinabove;
(c) Make whole all the employees named in Appendix A for any
loss of wages in the manner provided in the section of the Intermediate
Report entitled, The remedy, and hereinabove;
(d) Completely disestablish and withhold recognition from E. A.
Laboratories Employees' Association as the collective, bargaining rep-
resentative of any of its employees;
(e) Upon request, bargain collectively with International Union,
United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers
of America, C. I. 0., as the representative of its employees in the ap-
propriate unit, and, if agreement is reached, embody such understand-
ing in a written agreement ;
(f) Post immediately at its plant at Brooklyn, New York, copies
of the notice attached hereto marked Appendix A.8 Copies of said
notice, to be furnished by the Regional Director for the Second Region,
shall, after being duly signed by the Respondent, be posted by the Re-
spondent immediately upon receipt thereof, and maintained by it for
sixty (60) consecutive days thereafter, in conspicuous places, including
all places where notices to employees are customarily posted. Reason-
able steps shall be taken by the Respondent to insure that said notices
are not altered, defaced, or covered by any other material;
(g) Notify the Regional Director for the Second Region in writing,
within ten (10) days from the date of this Order, what steps the
Respondent has taken to comply herewith.
AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint be, and it hereby
is dismissed, insofar as it alleges that the Respondent discriminatorily
discharged Marie Traynor and Frank Pravata.
APPENDIX A
NOTICE To ALL EMPLOYEES
Pursuant to a Decision and Order of the National Labor Relations
Board, and in order to effectuate the policies of the National Labor
Relations Act, we hereby notify our employees that :
WE WILL BARGAIN collectively upon request with the INTERNA-
TIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT AND AGRICULTURAL
.IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, C. I. O., as the exclusive repre-
8 In the event that this Order is enforced by a United States Court of Appeals, there
shall be inserted before the words , "A DECISION AND ORDER" the words , "A DECREE
OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ENFORCING."
718 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
sentative of all employees in the bargaining unit described herein
with respect to rates of pay, hours of employment or other condi-
tions of employment, and if an understanding is reached, embody
such understanding in a signed agreement. The bargaining unit is :
All employees employed at the Brooklyn plant exclusive of
clerical, bookkeeping and other office employees, employees
in the cost and accounting, time study, personnel, engineering
experimental and model makers, and sales departments,
draftsmen, timekeepers, watchmen and guards, two office
cleaning employees, inspectors and testers on all defense items,
administrative and executive officers, superintendents (in-
cluding building maintenance superintendent) and assistant
superintendents, general foremen, (including service depart-
ment foremen), department foreladies, and all other
supervisory employees as defined in the Act.
WEHEREBY DISESTABLISH E. A. LABORATORIES EDTPLOYEES'ASSO-
CIATION as the representative of any of our employees for the
purpose of dealing with us concerning grievances, labor disputes,
wages, rates of pay, hours of employment, or other conditions of
employment, and we will not recognize it or any successor thereto
for any of the above purposes.
WE WILL NOT dominate or interfere with the formation or admin,
istration of any labor organization or contribute financial or other
support to it.
WE WILL OFFER to the following named employees immediate
and full reinstatement to their former or substantially equivalent
positions without prejudice to any seniority or other rights or
privileges previously enjoyed, and make them and Egon Soren-
son whole for any loss of pay suffered as a result of the discrim-
ination :
GROUP I
Yola Granieri Americo Aldorasi Mary LaManna
Terry Bria Pat Barbieri
Tony Tartamella Frank Scaccio
Group II
Elsie Lenhart Carmella Vona James Lombardo
Frances Pintouri James Ruggerio Joseph LaPorta
Connie Benvenuto Albert Ruggerio Thomas Nunez
Pauline Lombardo Thomaso Mancuso John Porcelli
John Gurzillo Mitchel Monte Alfonse Santoro
Catherine Ultimo Joseph Gionta Stella Ambrazatis
E. A. LABORATORIES, INC. 719
Angela Indimeo Julia Zomchick Josephine Albanese
Oliver Denicola Julia Barnett Mary Long
Antionette Basile Teresa Solimine Mrs. Frances Ruggerio
WE WILL OFFER to the following named persons, upon applica-
cation, immediate and full reinstatement to their former or sub-
stantially equivalent positions without prejudice to any seniority
or other rights or privileges previously enjoyed, if employment
for them is immediately available; and, if such employment is
not available, we will place them upon a preferential hiring list
for employment and employ them as vacancies arise before new
persons are hired; and, we will make them whole for any loss of
pay suffered if they are not reinstated when employment becomes
available :
Group III
Mary Quagliari T. Sassano Clara O'Neil
Anthony Graziose A. Bitterman Mary Chetirtso
Louise Rosati Constance Gurzello Alphonse Santuro
Louise Solimine J. Ariani L. Napolitano
James DeMattei David Blackburn Rose Baldizzi
Ralph Cherico M. Morgan R. Prescito
Louis Luciano Mary Bianco J. Licori
Joseph Carolla J. Ciro Roberto Constantino
D. Ambrosino S. Maritino N. Pope
P. Auzelo J. Braccia Umberto Dallasanuro
R. Grella R. Catastini
E. Vonnes D. Villani
WE WILL also make whole the following named employees for
any loss of pay suffered as a result of discrimination :
Group IV
S. Greenstein C. Pagnozzi Miss C. Benvenuto
C. Pfaff F. Ardolino Mrs. M. De Cola
C. Castoro N. Viglione J. Oliverio
C. Wernet D. Limongelli V. Terruso
A. Carruba S. Rothschild Miss L. Lezzo
J. Vasaturo T. Caliguri Mrs. A. Greenman
J. Di Pietro B. Tomaino L. Ambrosino
A. D'Ambrosio P. Colasuono J. Lo Preto
T. Grieco M. Kuka Mrs. I. Schwartz
M. Grazioso F. Martano Mrs. F. Ruggerio
1. Nagler J. Gurzillo Miss R. Macchio
720 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Miss C. Fazio Mrs. C . Capobianco Mrs. J . Braccia
Mrs. M. Yovine Miss R. Chiusano F. Nicolette
Mrs. A . Provenzano Miss A. Aloi Miss J. Soldano
J. De Mattei Miss S. Rubino R. Castastini
J. Caroleo P. Kessler J. Cingari
Mrs. A. Nunari Mrs. A. Marelli A. Prudente
A. Graziose N. Crisci S. Martino
R. Cherico D. Persutti R. Brescia
A. Marchiano N. Cusanelli Miss L. D'Onofrio
F. Pravata P. Fasanello Miss J. Zomchick
E. Prusky T. Sassano Miss E. Siema
P. Meier .Mrs. S. Ambrazaitis Miss O. Savo
J. Stubel Mrs. E . Lenhart Miss R. Perkal
J. Zelez Miss G. Michiewicz A. Vetere
J. De Elia A. Tartamella Miss N. DiTonnnaso
P. Karle T. Mancuso D. Fischetti
E. Sorenson Miss R. Kavanaugh J. Mannone
A. Leomonda J. Scullion J. Grolz
L. Forte Miss F. LaRosa J. Zupancic
P. Alexxandrelli S. DeF .igueora J. Lombardo.
S, Costanzo A. D'Alessandro R. Leone
J. Russo J. Zello V. Impellizzeri
P. Oehrke A. Angelino Miss L. Caputo
N. Pojero J. Finno N. Abbondandolo
V. Zipser P. DiLorenzo Miss C. Gurzillo
D. Limongelli B. M. Doud F. Carnavale
J, Laieta J. Percelli Miss J. Bifulco
J. Ruggiero S. Marrese Miss P. Bock
J. Roccipio L. Medaglia Miss M. Ferrarelli
T. Nunez S. Bifalco M. Mira
P. Barbieri Miss Y. DiLieto Mrs. J . Douglas
J. Stanco J. Di Napoli F. Robleto
Miss J. Albanese J. Mattia A. Bitterman
Miss M. Guadagno Mrs. B . Feirman A. Zito
J. Fusco Miss M. Albarella J. lofrido
Miss C. Frederico J. Florio F. Sorrentino
Miss M. Bianco Miss R. DiRienzo Mrs. J . Karloff
Miss S. Palmeri Miss A. Bisignoli L. Malinosky
D. Lisita Miss S. Spanipinato 0. Denicola
Miss M. Fiere Miss J. Braun V. Forto
L. Cocchi Miss J. Esposito S. Picano
Miss Y. Savo S. Sarro C. Loguerico
Miss A. Casentino A. Bruno P. Fiorato
E. A. LABORATORIES, INC. 721
J. Gionta Miss R. Tortorice Miss J. Cascio
L. Ricciardi C. Grella Miss D. Carlino
J. Mami Mrs. S. Campos Miss E. Femiano
F. Todisco Miss L. Caliguri Miss M. Benvenuto
A. Pandolfo Miss R. Caputo Miss E. Cassano
H. King Miss M. Morgan Mrs. J. Deldman
Miss J. Grande A. Del Monico Miss T. Giommetti
Miss J. Fucci Mrs. J. Langone C. Cocchiola
Miss M. Sorrentino Miss D. Crispe G. Carollo
Mrs. J. Agapito Mrs. P. Marrazzo G. Giovanniello
Miss F. Cappellino Miss L. Bonfandio Mrs. Al. Cerullo
Miss R. Baldizzi J. Borelli A. Ambrosino
Miss A. Loguericio Miss S. Spitz Mrs. T. Raff a
Miss S. Palmeri Mrs. L. Russo A. Sgambati
T. Stango Miss S. Plisken S. Fonte
J. Zamperelli Miss M. Abenante F. Travaglini
Miss J. Beninato Miss C. Eisenhauer P. Angelo
J. Cassano Miss C. Ilecito A. Pondillo
V. Minichiello Miss S. Bucci L. Luciano
M. Fasano Miss J. Girimonte S. Scigliano
A. Gabriele Miss M. Iannella T. Furno
F. Amatucci Miss I. Novak D. Candreva
Miss E. Palo Miss N. Bianco Dominic Pascucci
Mrs. Z. Philp Miss M. Brentano A. Ruggiero
Mrs. R. Vannata Mrs. J. Calligani Miss A. Berardi
M. Guarno Miss M. Crolius R. Riccio
Miss J. Cinque R. Girolano Miss R. Paopoli
P. Coveli Miss A. Capelli Miss V. Bastone
Mrs. AT. Chetirko Mrs. A. Malfi Miss AT. Troiano
Miss M. Long Miss J. Genova Miss T. Aloi
Mrs. M. Credidio Miss I. Depaolo Mrs. R. Castellano
N. Nipitella Miss P. Becker Miss M. Luchetti
Miss A. Wurtzel Miss J. Ciro Miss A. Pavone
Mrs. A. Indinemao Miss V. Esposito Miss D. Keogh
M. Monte Miss M. Silvis Miss C. Carone
J. Marino Miss A. Sergio Miss M. Lezzo
D. Principe Mrs. F. Colacino Miss L. Cardone
P. Guidice Miss E. Troucchio Miss J. Jardula
L. Liguri T. Markiewicz Mrs. K. Casella
C. Mingacci Miss F. Finamore Mrs. A. Locano
J. Ursino Miss M. DeCarlo Miss L. Pagano
Miss J. Campo Miss H. Trinkunas Miss J. Froda
S. Curcio Miss V. Ruggiero Miss M. Pugliese
722 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Miss F. Guinta J. Bolino F. Guidice
Miss J. Maniscalco Mrs. J . Barrett J. Esposito
S. Marine F. Ruggiero Gaspar Russo
Miss I. Cangero C. Gioia A. Aldorasi
D. D'Erecita A. Santoro A. Mula
Miss R. Auciello Miss P. Liotta S. Iacono
Miss J. Licari Miss E. Imbriano L. Ruggiero
Miss D. Vicario Miss E. Grande Miss L. Rallo
Miss R. Episcope Miss M. Giglio Miss T. Grella
Miss C. Vitrano Mrs. M . Mattia Miss L. Rosati
P. Lobosco Miss F. Stasi Miss E. Rosenzweig
Miss T. DeRosa Mrs. R . Tartonello Miss M. Curcio
Mrs. R . Misiano G. May E. Villolla
Mrs. A. Palladino E. Maiorano J. Mascia
Miss M. Macerino Mrs. G . Grolla Miss A. Pepe
Miss G. Samatora Miss E. Curcio Miss G. Franzose
Miss A. Mormle Miss C. Savillo Miss M. Caliguiri
Mrs. M. DeSenna Miss M. Minelta Miss L. Solimine
Miss M. Sekura Miss E. Venice Miss P. Lombardo
Miss M. Russo F. Arpino Mrs. T. Bria
Miss T. Tazzetta Miss Y. Granieri E. Wiehle
Miss J. Laurenzano Miss N. Pepe Miss R. Auciello
Miss F. Meehan Mrs. J . Grandinette Miss L. Novellino
Mrs. G . Brecht A. Ruggiero Miss A. Fiorentino
S. Occhiuto Mrs. F . Castellano Miss T. Durso
M. Biancardi A. Calabro Mrs. R . Schuderi
D. Lagana Miss J. Ariani J. Pavone
D. Astore Mrs. A . Oglesbee Miss F. Bonfandio
Miss C. Blau Mrs. A. Buscemi Miss R. Sonna
A. Francone Miss M. Clinque T. Young
J. Guadagno N. Bacchi S. Grillo
A. Bubello Miss E. Martello Miss M. Cirrisi
A. DeRose Miss R. Dima Miss R. Scala
Miss S. Castiglione Miss J. Volta Miss H. Ruggiero
V. Leonardi Mrs. R . Rossini Miss C. Softy
J. Stillitano Miss S. Adams Mrs. G . Helgerson
R. Grella Miss A. Costa Miss A. Cicarelli
J. La Porta J. Lubrano Mrs. G. Hilbert
N. Iannuzzi A. Devito Miss A. Palmeri
R. Mathiew T. Cuto Miss M. Pick
F. Scaccio Miss J. Guinta L. Napolitano
A. Triano Miss A. Jennewein Miss M. Scandals
Miss M. Bottari Miss M. Maggio Miss V. Lent
E. A. LABORATORIES, INC. 723
Miss C. O'Neill Miss M. Aloi Patsy Dearado
Miss R. Marchione Ignazzio Chiappone
Miss T. Pascucci Gilbert Scandale
WE WILL NOT in any manner interfere with, restrain, or coerce
our employees in the exercise of the right to self-organization, to
form labor organizations, to join or assist INTERNATIONAL UNION,
UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT AND AGRICULTURAL W ORKERS OF
AMERICA, C. I. 0., or any other labor organization, to bargain
collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and
to engage in concerted activities for the purpose of collective
bargaining or other mutual aid or protection.
All our employees are free to become or remain members of this
union, or any other labor organization. We will not discriminate
in regard to hire or tenure of employment or any term or condition
of employment against any employee because of membership in or
activity on behalf of any such labor organization.
E. A. LABORATORIES, INC.,
Employer.
Dated------------------------ By -------------------------
(Representative ) (Title)
This notice must remain posted for 60 days from the date hereof,,
and must not be altered, defaced, or covered by any other material..