E. T. Gresham Co., Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsAug 26, 194985 N.L.R.B. 891 (N.L.R.B. 1949) Copy Citation In the Matter of E. T. GRESHAM COMPANY, INC., EMPLOYER and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 147, A. F. OF L., PETITIONER Case No. 5-RC-298.Decided August 2 6., 1949 DECISION AND ORDER Upon a petition duly filed, a hearing was held before Harold G. Bier- mann, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hear- ing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Chairman Herzog and Members Houston and Gray]. Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds : The Employer is a Virginia corporation engaged at Norfolk, Vir- ginia, in the business of industrial building construction, hauling and rigging, and the rental of trucks and cranes. During the calendar year 1948, the Employer's total revenue was $652,927.37, of which $403,974.86 was derived from building construction, $142,987.80 from the operation and rental of the Employer's cranes, and $105,964.71 from the operation and rental of the Employer's trucks.' All of the Employer's building construction is performed within the State of Virginia, and in 1948 included such projects as construction on a dairy plant, a Sunday School, a warehouse for a truck line, and an oyster shucking shed for a fish company.2 Except in emergencies, the Em- ployer's trucks and cranes are used only within Virginia .3 Approx- imately one-half of 1 percent of the Employer's truck and crane rev- enue was derived from the out-of-State use of such equipment. From 1 The employer estimated that approximately 10 percent of the crane revenue and 12 to 15 percent of the truck revenue represented work on the Employer ' s own building construction projects. ' The record does not reflect whether or not the dairy plant, the truck line, or the fish company are engaged in commerce. " The Employer 's cranes have been utilized on local construction work for certain oil companies which are concededly engaged in commerce . They have also been utilized on local construction work for various manufacturing concerns ; the record does not reflect whether or not such manufacturing concerns are engaged in commerce. 85 N. L. R. B., No. 152. 891 892 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 1 to 2 percent of the Employer's total revenue was derived from work performed for the United States Government. During the same period, the Employer purchased supplies and equipment 4 valued at $217,559.28. With the exception of purchases valued at $19,828.97, which were made from manufacturers or dis- tributors located outside of Virginia, all such purchases were made from manufacturers or distributors located within the State of Vir- ginia. Of the purchases made within Virginia, purchases valued at $16,937.88 were made from Virginia distributors of interstate enter- prises, or from Virginia enterprises over which the Board has pre- viously asserted jurisdiction. In addition, cable, tires, and parts for the Employer's cranes and trucks, valued at $5,519.29, although pur- chased within Virginia, were manufactured outside of Virginia. The Employer's president conceded that additional supplies and equipment purchased from Virginia distributors may have been manu- factured outside of Virginia. He was, however, unable to estimate, and the record does not disclose, what proportion of such purchases were manufactured outside of Virginia.5 The Employer asserts that it is not engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act. Although we do not find that the Employer's operations are wholly unrelated to commerce, we believe that they are essentially local in nature, and that the assertion of jurisdiction in this case would not effectuate the policies of the Act 6 We shall, accord- ingly, dismiss the petition. ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition herein be, and it hereby is, dismissed. ,'The supplies and equipment purchased were primarily for use in the Employer's con- struction operations. 6 The Employer ' s 8 cranes , 14 trucks , 5 welding machines , and 4 compressors , which cost the Employer in excess of $170,000 , were purchased from distributors located in Virginia, but were manufactured outside of Virginia . It does not appear that any of such equip- ment has been purchased since 1947 ; nor does the record reflect the Employer ' s plans with respect to the future purchases of such equipment . The out-of -State origin of the Employer's capital equipment does not, despite the substantial value of such equipment , transform an essentially local operation into an interstate enterprise . See Matter of Richter Transfer Company, 80 N. L. R. B . 1246 ( Member Reynolds dissenting). 6 Matter of Building and Construction Trades Council of Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania, and Vicinity, et al., 85 N. L. R. B. 241 ; Matter of William Rush Swoape d/b/a Swoape Truck and Crane Service, 83 N. L. It. B. 671 ; Matter of Harvey M. Hanawalt, d/b/a Hanawalt Bros ., 80 N. L. R. B. 1302; Matter of Richter Transfer Company, 80 N. L. It, B. 1246. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation