E. H. Ferree Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsApr 22, 194877 N.L.R.B. 283 (N.L.R.B. 1948) Copy Citation In the Matter of E. H. FERREE COMPANY, EMPLOYER and FERREE EMPLOYEES' INDEPENDENT UNION, PETITIONER Case No. 3-RC-2.-Decided April N2, 1948 Mr. Frederic R. Twelvetrees, of Buffalo, N. Y., for the Employer. Mr. J. Carl Fogle, of Lockport, N. Y., for the Petitioner. Mr. David Diamond, of Buffalo, N. Y., for the Intervenor. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon an amended petition duly filed, hearing in this case was held at Lockport, New York, on January 21, 1948, before V. Lee McMahon, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations Board 1 makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF TIIE EMPLOYER E. H. Ferree Company,2 a New York corporation, is engaged in the manufacture of men's and women's billfolds, key cases, and other small leather goods at its plant in Lockport, New York. The Em- ployer annually purchases raw materials valued in excess of $150 ,000, approximately 30 percent of which represents shipments from outside the State of New York. The Employer annually sells finished products valued at more than $335,000, of which approximately 50 percent represents shipments to points outside the State. The Employer admits and we find that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. 1 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three -man panel consisting of the undersigned Board Members [ Houston , Murdock , and Gray]. 2 The name of the Employer appears as amended at the hearing. 77 N. L. R. B., No 38. 283 284 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED The Petitioner is an unaffiliated labor organization 3 claiming to represent employees of the Employer. United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 686, herein called the Intervenor, is a labor organi- zation afiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, claim- ing to represent employees of the Employer. III. TILE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION Since 1942, when it won a consent election, the Intervenor has been the contractual bargaining representative of the employees here in- volved. The last contract provided for an initial 16-month period ending November 1, 1947,-and for its renewal annually thereafter in the absence of 30 days' notice in writing of a desire to amend or termi- nate; and in the event that timely notice was given during 1947 and the parties failed to reach agreement within 30 days after November 1, 1947, the contract would then terminate. On August 10, 1947, the Petitioner requested recognition as the exclusive bargaining agent of these employees. The Employer refused because of its contract with the Intervenor. Thereafter, on August 29, 1947, the Employer gave notice of its desire to terminate the contract in accordance with its terms, and, as already noted, the Employer and the Intervenor did not enter into any further agreement. On September 5, 1947, the Petitioner filed its petition herein. The 1946 contract was not urged as a bar at the hearing, and it is clear that the contract has been effectively terminated. Consequently, it cannot prevent an election at this time. We find, therefore, that a question affecting commerce exists con- cerning the representation of employees of the Employer, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IT. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT We find, in agreement with the parties, that all employees of the Employer excluding office and clerical personnel, shipping clerks, guards, professional employees, executives, and all or any other super- visors, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. 3 At the hearing , the Intervenor moved that the petition be dismissed on the ground that the Petitioner is not a labor organization within the meaning of the Act. The record discloses that the Petitioner has a constitution and bylaws which, contrary to the Inter- venor ' s contention , were adopted at a regular membership meeting The record shows further that the Petitioner is organized in part , at least , to represent the employees of the Employer in matters which are customarily the subject of collective bargaining We therefore find that the Petitioner is a labor organization within the meaning of Section 2 (5) of the Act. Accordingly , the motion to dismiss is denied E. H. FERREE COMPANY V. TIIE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES 285 We shall direct that the question concerning representation which exists be resolved by an election by secret ballot, subject to the limita- tions and additions set forth in the Direction. The recently expired contract between the Employer and the Intervenor provided that laid-off employees should retain their sen- iority for 2 years and that they should also have preferred status in case,of rehiring during that period. The parties apparently agree that such employees are temporarily laid off and should be permitted to vote. Under these circumstances, we shall adopt the agreement of the parties and permit individuals in this category to vote in the election hereinafter directed, with the proviso that those among them who have refused an offer of reemployment by the Employer, or who have obtained permanent employment elsewhere, shall not be entitled to vote. DIRECTION OF ELECTION 4 As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with E. H. Ferree Company, Lock- port, New York, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Di- rector for the Third Region, and subject to Sections 203.61 and 203.62, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 5, and to our determination in Section V, above, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were em- ployed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election and also excluding employees on strike who are not entitled to reinstatement, to determine whether they desire to be represented by Ferree Employees' Independent Union or by United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 686, C. I. 0., for the purposes of collective bargain- ing, or by neither. Any participant in the election directed herein may, upon its prompt request to, and approval thereof by , the Regional Director, have its name removed from the ballot. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation