01A41214
04-08-2004
Duwan L. Lang v. Department of the Navy
01A41214
April 8, 2004
.
Duwan L. Lang,
Complainant,
v.
Gordon R. England,
Secretary,
Department of the Navy,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A41214
Agency No. 02-00391-003
Hearing No. 170-A3-8217X
DECISION
Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's
appeal from the agency's final order in the above-entitled matter.
Complainant alleged that the agency discriminated against her on the
bases of race (African-American) and sex (female), in violation of Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. �
2000e et seq., when:
Complainant was not selected for the position of Logistics
Management Specialist, GS-346-5/11, pursuant to Vacancy Announcement
No. PHL-01-0012; and,
Complainant was not selected for the position of Logistics
Management Specialist GS-346-7/11, pursuant to Vacancy Announcement
No. PHL-01-0012.<1>
The EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) issued a decision without a
hearing on claim 1, but conducted a hearing on claim 2.<2> After
a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration of
all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission to affirm the final agency order
with respect to claim 1, because we find that the AJ's issuance of a
decision without a hearing was appropriate, see Petty v. Department of
Defense, EEOC Appeal No. 01A24206 (July 11, 2003), and a preponderance
of the record evidence does not establish that discrimination occurred.
With respect to claim 2, we also find that the AJ's ultimate finding,
that unlawful employment discrimination was not proven by a preponderance
of the evidence, is supported by the record.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
April 8, 2004
__________________
Date
1Both positions were announced pursuant to
the same Vacancy Announcement, but different Selection Advisory Panels
were established for the positions at different grade levels.
2The AJ denied the agency's motion for a decision without a hearing for
claim 2, and conducted a hearing on that claim because she found that
the agency's investigation did not include the ratings and evaluations
of the panel members for the GS-7 position.