Duncan Electric Manufacturing Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsApr 2, 194240 N.L.R.B. 64 (N.L.R.B. 1942) Copy Citation r In the Matter of DUNCAN ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION B-1201 In the Matter of DUNCAN ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY and INDEPENDENT METER-WORKERS UNION Cases Nos. R-3603 and R-3604, respectively.Decided April 2, 1942 Jurisdiction: electric accessories manufacturing industry. Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question: refusal to accord recognition to petitioners until certified by the Board; election necessary. Where Company had agreed in settlement of strike that all strikers would be returned to their employment when work for which they were suited was available, striking employees who have not returned to work (except any who have been offered and have refused reinstatement) held eligible to participate in election, since they have a reasonable expectancy of reinstatement and are in a class with employees temporarily laid off. Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining :lall hourly and piece-work employees, excluding executives, foremen, other supervisory employees, engineers; watch- men, draftsmen, and clerical workers. Stuart, DeVol, Branigan cC Ball, by Mr. Allison E. Stuart and Mr. Michael T. Ricks, of Lafayette, Ind., for the Company. Mr. Francis O'Rourke and Mr. John L. McCarthy, of Indianapolis, Ind., for the I. B. E. W. Mr. Fae W. Patrick, of Indianapolis, Ind., for the Independent. Mr. Louis Cokin, of cou'isel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE On June 17 and 20, 1941, respectively, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union B-1201, herein called the I. B. E. W., and Independent Meter-Workers Union, herein called the Independent, filed with the Regional Director for the Eleventh Re- gion (Indianapolis, Indiana) separate petitions, each alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representa- tion of employees of Duncan Electric Manufacturing Company, Lafayette, Indiana, herein called the Company, and requesting an investigation and certification of representatives pursuant to Section 40 N L. R. B, No. 10. 64 DUNCANN ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY 65 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. On February 13, 1942, the National Labor Rela- tions Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act and Article III, Section 3, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, ordered are in- vestigation and authorized the Regional Director to conduct it and to provide, for an appropriate hearing upon due notice, and acting pursuant to Article III, Section 10 (c) (2), of said Rules and Regu- lations, ordered the two cases consolidated. On February 24, 1942, the Regional Director issued a notice of hearing, copies of which were duly served upon the Company, the I. B. E. W., and the Independent. Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held on March 5, 1942, at Lafayette, Indiana, before Robert D. Malarney, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Chief Trial Examiner. The Company, the I. B. E. W., and the Independent were represented and participated in the hearing. Full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues was afforded all parties. During the course of the hearing the Trial Examiner made several rulings on motions and on objections to the admission of evidence. The Board has reviewed these rulings and finds that no prejudicial errors were committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed.' Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. TIIE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Duncan Electric Manufacturing Company is an Illinois corpora- tion with its principal place of business at Lafayette, Indiana, where it is engaged in the manufacture, sale, and distribution of electricity meters and accessories . During 1940, the Company purchased raw materials valued in excess of $500,000, over 80 percent of which was shipped to it from points outside the State of Indiana. During the same period the Company sold finished products valued in excess of $1,900,000, over 85 percent of which was shipped by it to points out- side the State of Indiana. The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act. II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union B-1201, is a labor organization affiliated with the American Federa- 1 On March 26 , 1042 , the Company filed a motion to correct the record with respect to minor matters The motion is hereby granted 455771-42-vol 40-5 66 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD tion- of Labor, admitting to membership employees of the Company. Independent Meter-Workers Union is an unaffiliated labor organi- zation, admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Company refuses to recognize the I. B. E. W. or the Independent as the exclusive representative of its employees until such time as one or the other is certified by the Board. All the parties stipulated that the I. B. E. W. and the Independent each represents a substantial number of employees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate. We find that a question has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company. IV. THE EFFECT OF THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION UPON COMMERCE We find that the question concerning representation,' whieh has arisen, occurring in connection with the operations of the Company described in Section I above, has a close, intimate, and substantial relation to trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States and tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce and the free flow of commerce. V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT All the parties agree, and we find, that all hourly and piece-work employees of the Company, excluding executives, foremen, other supervisory employees, engineers, watchmen, draftsmen, and clerical workers, constitute an appropriate unit. We further find that such unit will insure to employees of the Company the full 'benefit of their right to self-organization and to collective bargaining and otherwise will effectuate the policies of the Act. VI. THE DETERMINATION or REPRESENTATIVES We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen can best be resolved by means of an election by secret ballot. On July 17, 1941, the I. B. E. W. called a strike at the Company's plant. The strike lasted until September 17, 1941, and was settled by an agreement between the Company and the I. B. E. W., which provided that all strikers -N-,ould be returned to their employment work for which they were suited was available. At the time of the hearing, 27 strikers had not yet been recalled by the Company. The I. B. E. W. contends that all striking employees not yet returned to %i-ork should be eligible to vote in the election. The Independent contends that only those employees who have requested reinstatement DUNCAN ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY : 67 should be eligible to vote and that, in any event, striking employees who have found permanent employment elsewhere should not be allowed to vote. The Company took no position with respect to the eligibility of the strikers but stated that it is still its intention to recall (he, strikers when work is available for them. Under these circum- stances, we find that the striking employees who have not yet returned .to work, (except any who have been offered and have refused rein- -statement), have a reasonable expectancy of reinstatement, are in a class with employees temporarily laid off, and are entitled to partici= pate in the election. We shall direct that the employees of the Company eligible to vote in the election shall be those within the .appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election herein, including striking employees not yet returned to work, but subject to the limitations and other additions set forth in the Direction. , Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the repre- sentation of employees of Duncan Electric Manufacturing Company, Lafayette, Indiana, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. 2. All hourly and piece-work employees of the Company, exclud- ing executives, foremen, other supervisory employees, engineers, watchmen, draftsmen, and clerical employees, -constitute a unit ap- propriate for the purposes of collective bargaining, within the mean- mng of Section 9 (b) of the Act. DIRECTION' OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in' the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby - DIRTCTEn that, as part of the investigation ordered by the Board to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Duncan Electric Manufacturing Company, Lafayette, Indiana, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the" Eleventh Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Section 9, of said 68 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ,BOARD Rules and Regulations , among all hourly and piece-work employees of the Company who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including striking employees not yet returned to work (except any who have been offered and have refused reinstatement) and employees who did not work during such pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or in the active military training or service of the United States, or temporarily laid off, but excluding executives, foremen, other super- visory employees, engineers, watchmen, draftsmen, clerical employees, and employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause, to determine whether they desire to be represented by International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union B-1201 , affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, or by Independent Meter- Workers Union, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation