Dubliner, Inc.v.The Irish Dairy Board Co-Operative LimitedDownload PDFTrademark Trial and Appeal BoardNov 10, 2008No. 91164315 (T.T.A.B. Nov. 10, 2008) Copy Citation Mailed 10 November 2008 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ______ Dubliner, Inc. v. The Irish Dairy Board Co-Operative Limited _____ Opposition No. 91164315 Cancellation No. 92044189 _____ Decision on Remand ______ Joseph D. Lewis of Barnes & Thornburg, LLP for Dubliner, Inc. Anthony R. Masiello of Holland & Knight LLP for The Irish Dairy Board Co-Operative Limited. ______ Before Rogers, Drost, and Mermelstein, Administrative Trademark Judges. Opinion by Drost, Administrative Trademark Judge: On August 30, 2007, the board held in favor of defendant The Irish Dairy Board Co-Operative Limited (applicant/respondent) and dismissed the notice of opposition to the registration of defendant’s application Serial No. 75922820 and denied a petition to cancel defendant’s Registration No. 2319632, both filed by plaintiff Dubliner, Inc. (opposer/petitioner). THIS OPINION IS NOT A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Opposition No. 91164315 Cancellation No. 92044189 2 After the board’s decision, plaintiff appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On October 10, 2008, the Court issued the following order: Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion to remand this case … for further proceeding consistent with the settlement agreement reached by the parties and, specifically, to allow the parties to jointly move the Board for vacatur of its decision on appeal, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) All remaining motions are moot. (3) Each side shall bear its own costs. The parties have now filed a Joint Motion to Vacate Judgment and Terminate Proceedings, which provides as follows: By this motion, the parties expressly do not request any relief that would adversely affect the Application or the Registration. It is the intention of the parties that if the Board grants this motion, or any part thereof, the Application will remain pending, Applicant will be permitted to continue to prosecute it to ultimate registration, and the Registration will continue to subsist on the Principal Register. Joint Motion at 2-3 (emphasis in original). Specifically, the parties request (Joint Motion at 4) that the Board: (1) Vacate its decision issued on August 30, 2007; (2) Deem the Opposition and the Cancellation withdrawn with prejudice; and (3) Forward the Application to the appropriate division of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for issuance of a registration in due course. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual of Procedure, Section 544, provides: Opposition No. 91164315 Cancellation No. 92044189 3 Where the parties are agreed that the circumstances warrant the vacating or setting aside of a final judgment, a stipulation or consented motion for relief from the judgment should be filed. The Board ordinarily will grant a consented request for relief from judgment. Inasmuch as there are no circumstances that would suggest that relief from judgment would not be appropriate in this case and the result is consistent with the decision of August 30, 2007, the motion to vacate is granted. Decision: Plaintiff’s notice of opposition to Application Serial No. 75922820 and petition to cancel Registration No. 2319632, are both withdrawn with prejudice. The Joint Motion to vacate the judgment of the board entered August 30, 2007, is granted. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation