Drew A. Weissmuller, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 14, 2006
01A55963 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 14, 2006)

01A55963

03-14-2006

Drew A. Weissmuller, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Drew A. Weissmuller,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A55963

Agency No. 1F-853-0028-05

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated August 25, 2005, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq. and

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et

seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO

Counselor contact.

In his complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected to

discrimination on the bases of age (D.O.B. 06/04/54) and reprisal for prior

protected EEO activity when, effective January 8, 2005, complainant

received a pay for performance raise which he believed to be insufficient.

Complainant indicated on appeal that he asked around regarding the raises.

Complainant found out that another employee did not receive a higher raise

because he was a witness in an EEO complaint. Complainants then discussed

the issue with other supervisors and found out the ages and raise amounts

for others.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(b) states that the agency shall dismiss

a complaint or a portion of a complaint that fails to comply with the

applicable time limits contained in �1614.105, �1614.106 and �1614.204(c),

unless the agency extends the time limits in accordance with �1614.604(c).

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of

discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment

Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the matter

alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel action, within

forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action. The Commission

has adopted a "reasonable suspicion" standard (as opposed to a "supportive

facts" standard) to determine when the forty-five day limitation period is

triggered. See Howard v. Department of Navy, EEOC Request No. 05970852

(February 11, 1999). Thus, the time limitation is not triggered until a

complainant reasonably suspects discrimination, but before all the facts

that support a charge of discrimination have become apparent.

The record discloses that the alleged discriminatory event occurred on

January 8, 2005, but complainant did not initiate contact with an EEO

Counselor until April 9, 2005, which is beyond the forty-five (45) day

limitation period. On appeal, complainant has presented no persuasive

arguments or evidence warranting an extension of the time limit for

initiating EEO Counselor contact. Accordingly, the agency's final decision

dismissing complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case

if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29

C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and

arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C.

20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider

shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of

the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604.

The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other

party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in

very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or

department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case

in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and

not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action

will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of

the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The

grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court.

Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in which to file

a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within

the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil

Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 14, 2006

__________________

Date