Donovan & Associates

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Jan 27, 1995

316 N.L.R.B. 169 (N.L.R.B. 1995)

169
316 NLRB No. 34
DONOVAN & ASSOCIATES
1 An affidavit submitted by the Regional Director also indicates
that no answer was filed to the original complaint. In any event, if
an answer was filed to the original complaint, it was withdrawn by
the terms of the settlement agreement. We take administrative notice
that the settlement form used by the parties was NLRB Form 4775,
the standard informal settlement agreement, which expressly pro-
vides that approval of the settlement agreement ‘‘shall constitute
withdrawal of any Complaint(s) and Notice of Hearing heretofore
issued in this case, as well as any answer(s) filed in response.’’
(Emphasis added.) Thus, any answer that may have been filed to the
original complaint would not remain extant and would not preclude
summary judgment. See Orange Data, 274 NLRB 1018 (1985);
Ofalco Properties, 281 NLRB 84 (1986); and Signage Systems, 312
NLRB 1115 (1993).
James Donovan d/b/a Donovan & Associates and
West-Central Michigan District Council,
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners
of America, AFL–CIO. Case 7–CA–33954
January 27, 1995
DECISION AND ORDER
BY MEMBERS BROWNING, COHEN, AND
TRUESDALE
Upon a charge and an amended charge filed by
West-Central Michigan District Council, United Broth-
erhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL–
CIO (the Union) on November 24 and December 21,
1992, respectively, the Regional Director for Region 7
of the National Labor Relations Board issued a com-
plaint on December 31, 1992, against James Donovan
d/b/a Donovan & Associates, the Respondent, alleging
that it has violated Section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Act.
Thereafter, on March 15, 1993, the Regional Direc-
tor approved an informal settlement agreement entered
into by the Respondent and the Union, disposing of the
allegations in the complaint. However, on September
15, 1994, the Regional Director issued an order setting
aside the settlement agreement and reissuing the com-
plaint inasmuch as the Respondent has failed to com-
ply with the settlement agreement.
Although properly served copies of the September
15, 1994 complaint, the Respondent failed to file an
answer thereto. Accordingly, on December 19, 1994,
the General Counsel filed a Motion for Default Sum-
mary Judgment with the Board. On December 22,
1994, the Board issued an order transferring the pro-
ceeding to the Board and a Notice to Show Cause why
the motion should not be granted. The Respondent
filed no response. The allegations in the motion are
therefore undisputed.
The National Labor Relations Board has delegated
its authority in this proceeding to a three-member
panel.
Ruling on Motion for Default Summary Judgment
Sections 102.20 and 102.21 of the Board’s Rules
and Regulations provide that the allegations in the
complaint shall be deemed admitted if an answer is not
filed within 14 days from service of the complaint, un-
less good cause is shown. In addition, the September
15, 1994 complaint affirmatively noted that unless an
answer were filed within 14 days of service, all the al-
legations in the complaint would be considered admit-
ted. Further, the undisputed allegations in the Motion
for Default Summary Judgment disclose that the Re-
gion, by letter dated October 6, 1994, notified the Re-
spondent that unless an answer were received by Octo-
ber 20, 1994, a Motion for Default Summary Judgment
would be filed. Nevertheless, as indicated above, the
Respondent failed to file an answer to the September
15, 1994 complaint.1
Accordingly, in the absence of good cause being
shown for the failure to file a timely answer to the
September 15, 1994 complaint, we grant the General
Counsel’s Motion for Default Summary Judgment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent has been
owned by James Donovan, a sole proprietorship, doing
business as Donovan and Associates. The Respondent
has an office and place of business in Belding, Michi-
gan, and has been engaged in the construction industry
as a carpentry contractor.
During the 12-month period ending November 30,
1992, the Respondent provided services valued in ex-
cess of $50,000 for Farnell Equipment Company, an
enterprise within the State of Michigan, which com-
pany during the above-mentioned period purchased and
received at its jobsites in Michigan goods valued in ex-
cess of $50,000 directly from points outside the State
of Michigan.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6),
and (7) of the Act and that the Union is a labor organi-
zation within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
All carpentry employees employed by the Respond-
ent within the geographical jurisdiction set forth in the
1990–1993 collective-bargaining agreement between
the Union and the Labor Relations Division, Michigan
Chapter, Associated General Contractors of America,
Incorporated and the Southwestern Michigan Contrac-
tors Association; but excluding guards and supervisors
as defined in the Act constitute a unit appropriate for
the purposes of collective bargaining within the mean-
ing of Section 9(b) of the Act (the unit).
On about April 23, 1992, the Respondent, an em-
ployer engaged in the building and construction indus-
170 DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
2 To the extent that an employee has made personal contributions
to a fund that are accepted by the fund in lieu of the employer’s
delinquent contributions during the period of the delinquency, the
Respondent will reimburse the employee, but the amount of such re-
imbursement will constitute a setoff to the amount that the Respond-
ent otherwise owes the fund.
try, granted recognition to the Union as the exclusive
collective-bargaining representative of the unit by en-
tering into a collective-bargaining agreement with the
Union for the period April 23, 1992, to May 31, 1993,
without regard to whether the majority status of the
Union had ever been established under the provisions
of Section 9 of the Act.
For the period of April 23, 1992, to May 31, 1993,
based on Section 9(a) of the Act, the Union has been
the limited exclusive collective-bargaining representa-
tive of the unit.
Since about June 1, 1992, the Respondent has uni-
laterally implemented changes in the terms and condi-
tions of employment of the employees in the unit, in-
cluding changes in contractual provisions referred to
below:
Since about June 1, 1992, the Respondent has uni-
laterally ceased making fringe benefit contributions re-
quired in the collective-bargaining agreement referred
to above, including contributions to the health care and
pension fund and the joint apprenticeship and training
fund.
Since about June 1, 1992, the Respondent has uni-
laterally ceased deducting dues and/or ceased remitting
dues that were deducted from employees’ paychecks as
required by the collective-bargaining agreement re-
ferred to above.
By letter dated November 18, 1992, the Respondent
advised the Union that it was repudiating the collec-
tive-bargaining agreement referred to above in its en-
tirety.
Although the subjects set forth above relate to
wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of em-
ployment of the unit and are mandatory subjects for
the purposes of collective bargaining, the Respondent
engaged in the conduct described above without prior
notice to the Union and without affording the Union
an opportunity to bargain with the Respondent with re-
spect to this conduct.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By the acts and conduct described above, the Re-
spondent has been failing and refusing to bargain col-
lectively and in good faith with the limited exclusive
collective-bargaining representative of its employees,
and has thereby engaged in unfair labor practices af-
fecting commerce within the meaning of Section
8(a)(1) and (5) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in
certain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease
and desist and to take certain affirmative action de-
signed to effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifi-
cally, we shall order the Respondent to honor the
terms and conditions of the 1992–1993 collective-bar-
gaining agreement, including, among other things, the
provisions concerning fringe-benefit contributions and
union security, and to make whole the unit employees
for any loss of earnings and other benefits suffered as
a result of the repudiation of the collective-bargaining
agreement on November 18, 1992. In addition, we
shall order the Respondent to make whole the unit em-
ployees by making all contractually required fringe
benefit contributions which have not been made since
June 1, 1992, including any additional amounts due the
funds in accordance with Merryweather Optical Co.,
240 NLRB 1213, 1216 fn. 7 (1979),2 and by reimburs-
ing the employees for any expenses ensuing from its
failure to make the required contributions, as set forth
in Kraft Plumbing & Heating, 252 NLRB 891 fn. 2
(1980), enfd. mem. 661 F.2d 940 (9th Cir. 1981). All
payments to employees are to be computed in the man-
ner set forth in Ogle Protection Service, 183 NLRB
682 (1970), enfd. 444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971), with
interest as prescribed in New Horizons for the Re-
tarded, 283 NLRB 1173 (1987). Finally, we shall
order the Respondent to reimburse the Union for any
loss of dues ensuing from its failure to deduct and/or
remit dues since June 1, 1992, as required by the
1992–1993 agreement, with interest as prescribed in
New Horizons for the Retarded, supra.
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, James Donovan d/b/a Donovan & Associ-
ates, Belding, Michigan, its officers, agents, succes-
sors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Refusing to bargain collectively and in good
faith with West-Central Michigan District Council,
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of
America, AFL–CIO as the limited exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of the employees in the fol-
lowing unit, by repudiating its 1992–1993 collective-
bargaining agreement with the Union, by unilaterally
ceasing to make fringe benefit contributions, including
contributions to the health care and pension fund and
the joint apprenticeship and training fund, and by uni-
laterally ceasing to deduct dues and/or remit dues de-
ducted from employees’ paychecks, as required by the
1992–1993 collective-bargaining agreement:
All carpentry employees employed by the Re-
spondent within the geographical jurisdiction set
forth in the 1990–1993 collective-bargaining
agreement between the Union and the Labor Rela-
171DONOVAN & ASSOCIATES
3 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court
of appeals, the words in the notice reading ‘‘Posted by Order of the
National Labor Relations Board’’ shall read ‘‘Posted Pursuant to a
Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order
of the National Labor Relations Board.’’
tions Division, Michigan Chapter, Associated
General Contractors of America, Incorporated and
the Southwestern Michigan Contractors Associa-
tion; but excluding guards and supervisors as de-
fined in the Act.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with,
restraining, or coercing employees in the exercise of
the rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) Honor the terms and conditions of the 1992–
1993 collective-bargaining agreement with the Union,
including the provisions concerning fringe benefit con-
tributions and union security, and make whole the unit
employees for any loss of earnings and other benefits
suffered as a result of the repudiation of the collective-
bargaining agreement on November 18, 1992, as set
forth in the remedy section of this decision.
(b) Make all contractually required fringe benefit
contributions that have not been made since June 1,
1992, and make whole the unit employees for any ex-
penses ensuing from its failure to make such contribu-
tions, as set forth in the remedy section of this deci-
sion.
(c) Reimburse the Union for any loss of dues ensu-
ing from its failure to deduct dues from employees’
paychecks and/or remit dues since June 1, 1992, as re-
quired by the 1992–1993 collective-bargaining agree-
ment, as set forth in the remedy section of this deci-
sion.
(d) Preserve and, on request, make available to the
Board or its agents for examination and copying, all
payroll records, social security payment records, time-
cards, personnel records and reports, and all other
records necessary to analyze the amount of backpay
due under the terms of this Order.
(e) Post at its facility in Belding, Michigan, copies
of the attached notice marked ‘‘Appendix.’’3 Copies of
the notice, on forms provided by the Regional Director
for Region 7, after being signed by the Respondent’s
authorized representative, shall be posted by the Re-
spondent immediately upon receipt and maintained for
60 consecutive days in conspicuous places including
all places where notices to employees are customarily
posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the Re-
spondent to ensure that the notices are not altered, de-
faced, or covered by any other material.
(f) Notify the Regional Director in writing within 20
days from the date of this Order what steps the Re-
spondent has taken to comply.
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government
The National Labor Relations Board has found that we
violated the National Labor Relations Act and has or-
dered us to post and abide by this notice.
WE WILL NOT refuse to bargain collectively and in
good faith with West-Central Michigan District Coun-
cil, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of
America, AFL–CIO as the limited exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of the employees in the fol-
lowing unit, by repudiating our 1992–1993 collective-
bargaining agreement with the Union, by unilaterally
ceasing to make fringe benefit contributions, including
contributions to the health care and pension fund and
the joint apprenticeship and training fund, and by uni-
laterally ceasing to deduct dues and/or remit dues de-
ducted from employees’ paychecks, as required by the
1992–1993 collective-bargaining agreement:
All carpentry employees employed by us within
the geographical jurisdiction set forth in the
1990–1993 collective-bargaining agreement be-
tween the Union and the Labor Relations Divi-
sion, Michigan Chapter, Associated General Con-
tractors of America, Incorporated and the South-
western Michigan Contractors Association; but
excluding guards and supervisors as defined in the
Act.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL honor the terms and conditions of the
1992–1993 collective-bargaining agreement with the
Union, including the provisions concerning fringe ben-
efit contributions and union security, and WE WILL
make whole the unit employees for any loss of earn-
ings and other benefits suffered as a result of our repu-
diation of the collective-bargaining agreement on No-
vember 18, 1992, with interest.
WE WILL make all contractually required fringe ben-
efit contributions that have not been made since June
1, 1992, and WE WILL make whole the unit employees
for any expenses ensuing from our failure to make
such contributions, with interest.
WE WILL reimburse the Union for any loss of dues
ensuing from our failure to deduct and/or remit dues
since June 1, 1992, as required by the 1992–1993 col-
lective-bargaining agreement, with interest.
JAMES DONOVAN D/B/A DONOVAN &
ASSOCIATES